Search Results
7/19/2025, 5:18:24 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jBYUm3ux-I
7/17/2025, 4:14:25 AM
>>40740160
https://youtu.be/Av4hy0bp_Uk?si=OHCeYyFvA14VzpO9
I talk of freedom
you talk of the flag
I talk of revolution
you'd much rather brag
and as the decibels of this disenchanting
discourse continue to dampen the day
The coin flips again and again, and again,
and again as our sanity walks away
All this discussion
though politically correct
is dead beyond destruction
though it leaves me quite erect
And as the final sunset rolls behind the Earth
and the clock is finally dead
I'll look at you, you'll look at me
and we'll cry a lot
but this will be what we said
this will be what we said
Look where all this talking got us baby.
Look where all this talking got us baby
Look where all this talking got us baby
Look where all this talking got us baby
Talk on
https://youtu.be/Av4hy0bp_Uk?si=OHCeYyFvA14VzpO9
I talk of freedom
you talk of the flag
I talk of revolution
you'd much rather brag
and as the decibels of this disenchanting
discourse continue to dampen the day
The coin flips again and again, and again,
and again as our sanity walks away
All this discussion
though politically correct
is dead beyond destruction
though it leaves me quite erect
And as the final sunset rolls behind the Earth
and the clock is finally dead
I'll look at you, you'll look at me
and we'll cry a lot
but this will be what we said
this will be what we said
Look where all this talking got us baby.
Look where all this talking got us baby
Look where all this talking got us baby
Look where all this talking got us baby
Talk on
7/7/2025, 7:43:56 PM
>>509753249
OMG they want (you) to pay back the money you borrowed?
OMG they want (you) to pay back the money you borrowed?
6/24/2025, 9:00:32 AM
ID: /D2n9Spk/biz/60527899#60528242
6/20/2025, 11:00:44 PM
>>60528158
>so more like 4 months than 2 weeks
Yeah. Looking at the clinical trial data, the reason why their approach seems to consistently fail to yield results is mostly because they tried to aim for the most sickly patients that had no hope of being saved anyways. The median age is also old as hell, like around 49. They're finding more success in a preventative treatment rather than an outright cure.
The only conclusive result over their prior studies is that belapectin does no harm, or has negligible adverse effects. I think their primary issue is that they struggle to extract significantly statistically beneficial results, also in part due to taking on really risky patients in the first place that are decompensated and already have too many things wrong with them.
I think that's why their Phase 2/3 studies in their NAVIGATE trial is also extremely picky with who they allowed to trial. Out of 1100, they only have 357. Compared to their past studies, the qualifying criteria is a gigantic laundry list that rules out the really bad cases that could result in similar complications that was not primarily due to liver issues. This study actually started in 2020-06-22, so anyone who bought in early was not going to get a return on their investment for years anyways.
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04365868?term=%22Galectin%20Therapeutics%20Inc.%22&page=1&rank=1&tab=table
That's my extremely limited assessment of what I read through. Still super risky.
>so more like 4 months than 2 weeks
Yeah. Looking at the clinical trial data, the reason why their approach seems to consistently fail to yield results is mostly because they tried to aim for the most sickly patients that had no hope of being saved anyways. The median age is also old as hell, like around 49. They're finding more success in a preventative treatment rather than an outright cure.
The only conclusive result over their prior studies is that belapectin does no harm, or has negligible adverse effects. I think their primary issue is that they struggle to extract significantly statistically beneficial results, also in part due to taking on really risky patients in the first place that are decompensated and already have too many things wrong with them.
I think that's why their Phase 2/3 studies in their NAVIGATE trial is also extremely picky with who they allowed to trial. Out of 1100, they only have 357. Compared to their past studies, the qualifying criteria is a gigantic laundry list that rules out the really bad cases that could result in similar complications that was not primarily due to liver issues. This study actually started in 2020-06-22, so anyone who bought in early was not going to get a return on their investment for years anyways.
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04365868?term=%22Galectin%20Therapeutics%20Inc.%22&page=1&rank=1&tab=table
That's my extremely limited assessment of what I read through. Still super risky.
6/17/2025, 1:25:14 AM
>>507633965
So blacks have an avg -26 IQ from whites at 17 even when raised in the best conditions possible
Thanks for proving our point mate
So blacks have an avg -26 IQ from whites at 17 even when raised in the best conditions possible
Thanks for proving our point mate
6/12/2025, 10:28:13 PM
>>507128079
>2. Are willing and able to be in a serious relationship with them instead of just wanting to casually fuck them
Ahahahahahahaha. This is not what the majority of young women want. They do NOT want to be in a serious relationship with somebody average. They say it themselves. Serious relationships are only for the male outliers.
>2. Are willing and able to be in a serious relationship with them instead of just wanting to casually fuck them
Ahahahahahahaha. This is not what the majority of young women want. They do NOT want to be in a serious relationship with somebody average. They say it themselves. Serious relationships are only for the male outliers.
Page 1