>>105974855
Depending where you are, or what you're doing, there's always someone richer, more influential than you making terrible fucking decisions, all out of the need for wealth or power. Even if you live in a sane, progressive country, you still have to deal with assholes shitting up the world.

>>531896216
Logic dictates that if you want to play any Switch game online, you will need to use Nintendo's infrastructure, which you're wholly bypassing while emulating. If any emulator supports online play--as you and others have alluded to, it's either from a LAN standpoint, or you and whomever, need to setup a VLAN with software like Hamachi (assuming they're still kicking around).

Bottomline, you can't have your cake and eat it too, not unless you're willing to come up with your own recipe and bake it from scratch.

Mind, this is all conjecture--I'm not entirely familiar with that particular emulator. Much of this is from past experience.

>>714510669
Poor management, from what I heard
That's besides the point that most publishers are out to lunch as far as 'good games.'
>Hi-fi Rush received critical acclaim
>Devs still got shuttered by Microsoft
>Microsoft just announced they're doing 'bretty gud'
>Still shit-canned and/or shuttered studios to appease investors

>>105745189
It's 'fine™'
There are some questionalbel choices like RAM capacity, and I would definitely double check the SSD and PSU for QLC and reliability respectively, but otherwise I don't see any-
>Biostar

Fucking why? with the A620 chipset of all things. I be fair, I'm currently using it myself, but that's with an -X3D processor I KNOW I can't overclock.

>>713308687
Goddamn--who CARES if it's not 1:1

While it's objectively better, it's right up there with software emulation since it's nothing more than an imitation using modern hardware.

You're like my grandma that collects porcelain figurines.