Search Results
7/9/2025, 10:04:10 PM
ID: 0j9re/5v/pol/509376672#509378242
7/3/2025, 9:19:11 AM
6/29/2025, 7:04:48 AM
Nukes are neat
6/28/2025, 1:25:22 PM
>>508947866
That's not really true. The huge nukes were a reply to the belief of heavy air defense making bombing even huge targets like cities hard. The wild inaccuracies of early ballistic missiles not being able to get hits on target within ranges of 10s of km.
A 50MT nuke doesn't really need to be even close to it's target to be effective and clearing the way for more accurate follow on attacks.
As missiles improved in accuracy the warheads could be reduced in size to better match the expected performance. Letting more more nuclear weapons be made engage more targets.
Smaller bombs with much lower yields are more destructive when spread out. The material cost of nuclear material of one large bomb does more damage when made into many smaller bombs, if you can successfully strike smaller targets.
>>508948302
That guy is 100% correct.
That's not really true. The huge nukes were a reply to the belief of heavy air defense making bombing even huge targets like cities hard. The wild inaccuracies of early ballistic missiles not being able to get hits on target within ranges of 10s of km.
A 50MT nuke doesn't really need to be even close to it's target to be effective and clearing the way for more accurate follow on attacks.
As missiles improved in accuracy the warheads could be reduced in size to better match the expected performance. Letting more more nuclear weapons be made engage more targets.
Smaller bombs with much lower yields are more destructive when spread out. The material cost of nuclear material of one large bomb does more damage when made into many smaller bombs, if you can successfully strike smaller targets.
>>508948302
That guy is 100% correct.
6/28/2025, 1:25:22 PM
>>508947866
That's not really true. The huge nukes were a reply to the belief of heavy air defense making bombing even huge targets like cities hard. The wild inaccuracies of early ballistic missiles not being able to get hits on target within ranges of 10s of km.
A 50MT nuke doesn't really need to be even close to it's target to be effective and clearing the way for more accurate follow on attacks.
As missiles improved in accuracy the warheads could be reduced in size to better match the expected performance. Letting more more nuclear weapons be made engage more targets.
Smaller bombs with much lower yields are more destructive when spread out. The material cost of nuclear material of one large bomb does more damage when made into many smaller bombs, if you can successfully strike smaller targets.
>>508948302
That guy is 100% correct.
That's not really true. The huge nukes were a reply to the belief of heavy air defense making bombing even huge targets like cities hard. The wild inaccuracies of early ballistic missiles not being able to get hits on target within ranges of 10s of km.
A 50MT nuke doesn't really need to be even close to it's target to be effective and clearing the way for more accurate follow on attacks.
As missiles improved in accuracy the warheads could be reduced in size to better match the expected performance. Letting more more nuclear weapons be made engage more targets.
Smaller bombs with much lower yields are more destructive when spread out. The material cost of nuclear material of one large bomb does more damage when made into many smaller bombs, if you can successfully strike smaller targets.
>>508948302
That guy is 100% correct.
6/28/2025, 1:25:22 PM
>>508947866
That's not really true. The huge nukes were a reply to the belief of heavy air defense making bombing even huge targets like cities hard. The wild inaccuracies of early ballistic missiles not being able to get hits on target within ranges of 10s of km.
A 50MT nuke doesn't really need to be even close to it's target to be effective and clearing the way for more accurate follow on attacks.
As missiles improved in accuracy the warheads could be reduced in size to better match the expected performance. Letting more more nuclear weapons be made engage more targets.
Smaller bombs with much lower yields are more destructive when spread out. The material cost of nuclear material of one large bomb does more damage when made into many smaller bombs, if you can successfully strike smaller targets.
>>508948302
That guy is 100% correct.
That's not really true. The huge nukes were a reply to the belief of heavy air defense making bombing even huge targets like cities hard. The wild inaccuracies of early ballistic missiles not being able to get hits on target within ranges of 10s of km.
A 50MT nuke doesn't really need to be even close to it's target to be effective and clearing the way for more accurate follow on attacks.
As missiles improved in accuracy the warheads could be reduced in size to better match the expected performance. Letting more more nuclear weapons be made engage more targets.
Smaller bombs with much lower yields are more destructive when spread out. The material cost of nuclear material of one large bomb does more damage when made into many smaller bombs, if you can successfully strike smaller targets.
>>508948302
That guy is 100% correct.
6/28/2025, 1:25:22 PM
>>508947866
That's not really true. The huge nukes were a reply to the belief of heavy air defense making bombing even huge targets like cities hard. The wild inaccuracies of early ballistic missiles not being able to get hits on target within ranges of 10s of km.
A 50MT nuke doesn't really need to be even close to it's target to be effective and clearing the way for more accurate follow on attacks.
As missiles improved in accuracy the warheads could be reduced in size to better match the expected performance. Letting more more nuclear weapons be made engage more targets.
Smaller bombs with much lower yields are more destructive when spread out. The material cost of nuclear material of one large bomb does more damage when made into many smaller bombs, if you can successfully strike smaller targets.
>>508948302
That guy is 100% correct.
That's not really true. The huge nukes were a reply to the belief of heavy air defense making bombing even huge targets like cities hard. The wild inaccuracies of early ballistic missiles not being able to get hits on target within ranges of 10s of km.
A 50MT nuke doesn't really need to be even close to it's target to be effective and clearing the way for more accurate follow on attacks.
As missiles improved in accuracy the warheads could be reduced in size to better match the expected performance. Letting more more nuclear weapons be made engage more targets.
Smaller bombs with much lower yields are more destructive when spread out. The material cost of nuclear material of one large bomb does more damage when made into many smaller bombs, if you can successfully strike smaller targets.
>>508948302
That guy is 100% correct.
6/28/2025, 1:25:22 PM
>>508947866
That's not really true. The huge nukes were a reply to the belief of heavy air defense making bombing even huge targets like cities hard. The wild inaccuracies of early ballistic missiles not being able to get hits on target within ranges of 10s of km.
A 50MT nuke doesn't really need to be even close to it's target to be effective and clearing the way for more accurate follow on attacks.
As missiles improved in accuracy the warheads could be reduced in size to better match the expected performance. Letting more more nuclear weapons be made engage more targets.
Smaller bombs with much lower yields are more destructive when spread out. The material cost of nuclear material of one large bomb does more damage when made into many smaller bombs, if you can successfully strike smaller targets.
>>508948302
That guy is 100% correct.
That's not really true. The huge nukes were a reply to the belief of heavy air defense making bombing even huge targets like cities hard. The wild inaccuracies of early ballistic missiles not being able to get hits on target within ranges of 10s of km.
A 50MT nuke doesn't really need to be even close to it's target to be effective and clearing the way for more accurate follow on attacks.
As missiles improved in accuracy the warheads could be reduced in size to better match the expected performance. Letting more more nuclear weapons be made engage more targets.
Smaller bombs with much lower yields are more destructive when spread out. The material cost of nuclear material of one large bomb does more damage when made into many smaller bombs, if you can successfully strike smaller targets.
>>508948302
That guy is 100% correct.
6/28/2025, 1:25:22 PM
>>508947866
That's not really true. The huge nukes were a reply to the belief of heavy air defense making bombing even huge targets like cities hard. The wild inaccuracies of early ballistic missiles not being able to get hits on target within ranges of 10s of km.
A 50MT nuke doesn't really need to be even close to it's target to be effective and clearing the way for more accurate follow on attacks.
As missiles improved in accuracy the warheads could be reduced in size to better match the expected performance. Letting more more nuclear weapons be made engage more targets.
Smaller bombs with much lower yields are more destructive when spread out. The material cost of nuclear material of one large bomb does more damage when made into many smaller bombs, if you can successfully strike smaller targets.
>>508948302
That guy is 100% correct.
That's not really true. The huge nukes were a reply to the belief of heavy air defense making bombing even huge targets like cities hard. The wild inaccuracies of early ballistic missiles not being able to get hits on target within ranges of 10s of km.
A 50MT nuke doesn't really need to be even close to it's target to be effective and clearing the way for more accurate follow on attacks.
As missiles improved in accuracy the warheads could be reduced in size to better match the expected performance. Letting more more nuclear weapons be made engage more targets.
Smaller bombs with much lower yields are more destructive when spread out. The material cost of nuclear material of one large bomb does more damage when made into many smaller bombs, if you can successfully strike smaller targets.
>>508948302
That guy is 100% correct.
6/14/2025, 12:04:02 AM
>>507271505
>maybe because nukes are a scam and arent real
No that's not a possibility. Nuclear weapons and nuclear power is real.
It's not as fire as my mix tape but it's close.
>maybe because nukes are a scam and arent real
No that's not a possibility. Nuclear weapons and nuclear power is real.
It's not as fire as my mix tape but it's close.
Page 1