Search Results
7/1/2025, 2:11:39 PM
>>63919821
>install a v-shaped hull by welding corregated roof tiles to the bottom
>RWS on the roof
>swap the blades for chains to clear mines
>replace the glass with bulletproof glass
>rubber mats covering everything else
perfection
>install a v-shaped hull by welding corregated roof tiles to the bottom
>RWS on the roof
>swap the blades for chains to clear mines
>replace the glass with bulletproof glass
>rubber mats covering everything else
perfection
6/24/2025, 7:35:20 PM
>>63889586
>ukraine claims its one of the best weapons supplied
>hurr durr its actually underpfrofming becase, because well it just is ok!
>>63889607
From this interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fjn2U6ZHQs
>There are questions from the audience about how the CV90s performed on the battlefield, and why is there less information about them than, for example, about the Bradley? There is a lot of information about the Bradley, and it looks impressive and serious. What about the CV90?
>Let me tell you why. We have brigades that do not disseminate information about the results of their combat activities, and we have brigades that do disseminate information and fight partially live. That's why M2 got into the live broadcasts and everyone knows about it, and CV90 did not, so no one knows about it. In terms of efficiency and security, these IFVs are in the same class.
https://desuarchive.org/k/thread/61716669/#q61716873
>tldr
Opsec is the reason why the Bradley got the spotlight, not because it is performing any better than the CV90. They are about equal in performance although they mention the CV90 being more advanced in terms of its firepower and FCS.
>ukraine claims its one of the best weapons supplied
>hurr durr its actually underpfrofming becase, because well it just is ok!
>>63889607
From this interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fjn2U6ZHQs
>There are questions from the audience about how the CV90s performed on the battlefield, and why is there less information about them than, for example, about the Bradley? There is a lot of information about the Bradley, and it looks impressive and serious. What about the CV90?
>Let me tell you why. We have brigades that do not disseminate information about the results of their combat activities, and we have brigades that do disseminate information and fight partially live. That's why M2 got into the live broadcasts and everyone knows about it, and CV90 did not, so no one knows about it. In terms of efficiency and security, these IFVs are in the same class.
https://desuarchive.org/k/thread/61716669/#q61716873
>tldr
Opsec is the reason why the Bradley got the spotlight, not because it is performing any better than the CV90. They are about equal in performance although they mention the CV90 being more advanced in terms of its firepower and FCS.
6/22/2025, 10:30:09 PM
6/21/2025, 1:50:39 PM
>>63863104
>>63863503
>>63867058
I have a good friend who is a finn and is /in/, all they did was redesignate them as "anti-vehicle mines" before stashing them away as to skirt around the regulations, they were all "disposed off" but they all still exist. The production lines for them were never dismanteled either and were even getting maintainence as they planned to start producing them and throw them back out the second the ziggers got a bit too confident in their imperialistic aspirations, they were planing to break the ottowa convention instantly. Very based if you ask me.
>source
trust me bro, genunielly.
>>63863503
>>63867058
I have a good friend who is a finn and is /in/, all they did was redesignate them as "anti-vehicle mines" before stashing them away as to skirt around the regulations, they were all "disposed off" but they all still exist. The production lines for them were never dismanteled either and were even getting maintainence as they planned to start producing them and throw them back out the second the ziggers got a bit too confident in their imperialistic aspirations, they were planing to break the ottowa convention instantly. Very based if you ask me.
>source
trust me bro, genunielly.
Page 1