>>716519558
CAN YOU TAKE IT ALL AWAAAAAAAAAAY

We've seen the yuros.
We've seen the burgers.
Let's see what the aussies brought to the table.

>>509267256
>historical shiplogs
>"european" data sources
>same weight as NASA, meaning no consistency on the measurement methodology or itemization of which sources factored where
>>509267301
>"automated algorithms" identifying a wide variety of things that would directly influence the data, no mention of what factors are weighted where, or what constitutes an outlier and how many were in the dataset
>"robust" but unnamed statistical methods (weighting) to keep using obviously flawed datapoints rather than deleting it
>urban data is "corrected" (changed), no mention of how it's changed or why it would be changed other than "urban heat island effect"
>no mention of benchmarks
>no st.dev
>no discrete N value, a vague number when there's no reason
Anon, you tried; this does not mean what you think it does.