>>60570542
>it didn't work
It worked great (from the Fed’s perspective), they successfully pivoted from a system of systemic credit kite driven monetary expansion to a bond-interest driven monetary expansion without any backlash or protests from you wagie slaves. Huge success.

>>60548784
If the economy tanks, the Fed will brrrrrr and nominal values will pump regardless.

Remember:
No real-terms growth =/= no nominal growth.
No real-terms growth == parabolic nominal growth
Even real-terms contradiction == parabolic nominal growth

The game is rigged, the line will go up.

>>60534756
Money printer go brrrrrrr

>”with a money printer you can take the market wherever you want” he said to himself out loud