>>718613679
lol yep, 2010s was a hard time.
>>718613391
I blame that on Sega themselves, designs aside, Boom was shaping up to be a DECENT game, but then Sega got into the agreement with Nintendo's WiiU, and instead of letting the devs finish the game they were almost done with (which was originally meant for then current Sony/Micro systems), Sega essentially forced them to put the game on an engine it wasn't made for, thus forcing major cuts and graphical quality. The awful quality of the game and the cartoon getting shitty timeslots on CN (we're talking like 6 in the morning on weekends) and it's no surprise Boom bombed.