>>11495165
>she seriously needed to be shorter.
>the chinese ever making a character shorter when they fully believe it's okay for women figures to be canonically 6.5 feet / 200cm tall

Fat chance. I still hate western companies inventing the retarded "6 inch scale" cheesing method has lead to almost all chinese companies making their supposedly "1/12 scale" females 6.5 inches / 165mm tall.

>>11495179
Ignore those kinds of posts, probably a bot.

>>11454118
>ask for toy recommendations
>half the thread responds to questions about the supposed identity of shitposter(s)
>when it's obvious the shitposter is the one ASKNG THE FIRST QUESTION AND SUBSEQUENT QUESTIONS
>he even responds to himself with his usual long form rants
>never get any toy recommendations

You guys really gonna fall for bait this hard every thread?