>>718815852
Well why don’t we look at 3rd parties on the switch 2. Huh, seems like anything that isn’t a nintendo game just so happened to flop, go figure…

>>718002894
In reality across the board all 3rd party sales are down. On the other hand though, the only game that IS doing well just so happens to be the one game that didn’t take part in the scam key cards. Curious…

>>715157840
Even that’s not much of a reassurance given the news story about how pretty much all 3rd-party games were underperforming and/or outright bombing on the switch. Even when the switch 2 only had one big game people would rather pay $10 for better graphics on BotW than play 3rd party. Combined with weaker hardware and having to do all that work to optimize, at that point why even bother with a switch 2 port?

>>714386137
Supposedly it was because they wanted to have as much units as they could for launch, so most would-be devkits were for the consumer. If so there’s good intention there, but if picrel is anything to go by it may backfire

>>713450449
>Wii U ports
Finally get to play the games on a non-gimped system
>barely-changed sequel to a Wii U game that came out 1.5 years prior (Splatoon 2)
See first point
>and fucking Arms
At least it was something new and creative. On the other hand switch 2 is giving us crippleball. At least ARMS looked fun
>And in terms of 3rd party support Switch 1 was abysmal to begin with. Literally worse than Wii U
Of course, everyone expected that cause the wii u bombed. Switch 2 on the other hand has no excuse given everyone wanted to jump on the switch, yet I don’t see anyone willing to hop onto the switch 2, and with picrel I don’t see why would they