>>513342704
except its literally just a guess and you're going through mental gymnastics trying to justify it. newton didnt even believe in gravity or want it attributed to him lol

>>22884206
so your only counterpoint is "cavendish always works and is not falsifiable"? also, is that your only experiment you can provide to show that gravity is real?

i would love to be able to do an experiment that can demonstrate the bending and warping of space time, can you please show me one? oh yeah, can you show me an experiment that shows earth is spinning or orbiting the sun? oh wait, all the top astrophysicists all agree with me that there are zero experiments to prove earths motion:

"the sun is at rest and the earth moves" or "the sun moves and the earth is at rest" would simply mean two different conventions concerning two different coordinate systems - albert einstein, einstein and infeld, the evolution of physics, 1938 ED P. 248

"one can use either picture as a model of the universe, for our observations of the heavens can be explained by assuming either the earth OR the sun to be at rest" - stephen hawking 2008

"we know that the difference between a heliocentric theory and a geocentric theory is one of relative motion only, and that such a difference has no physical signifiance" - astronomer fred hoyle (astronomy and cosmology - a modern course (san francisco: W.H. Freeman & co, 1975) P. 416

so there are ZERO experiments ANY HUMAN can do from earth to prove that we're moving because it's all "relative" according to jewstein, and your ONLY experiment you can present for that space time can warp is a cavendish experiment which like i said is falsifiable entirely?

>>507293356
mr physics expert i dont deny you seem like an intelligent guy, here is one that even top astrophysicists don't have a rebuttal for: gas by definition always fills the container it is in. how come our atmosphere doesn't fill the empty container of outer space, considering we allegedly are floating in outer space (an open container) with no other container around earth

the ONLY rebuttal is going to be you reifying gravity, as though it exists, but to anyone intellectually honest this will be a difficult discussion to go down, considering how retarded and full of lies the mainstream explanation of "gravity" even is

if you think you are 100% confident you're spinning on a globe, and you consider yourself to be an intellectually honest person capable of changing their mind with new information, i would ask that you consider watching something like this and seeing if you either solidify your current opinion or maybe open your mind to other possibilities: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hnrlyOvUcQ

>>22822720
mr physics expert i dont deny you seem like an intelligent guy, here is one that even top astrophysicists don't have a rebuttal for: gas by definition always fills the container it is in. how come our atmosphere doesn't fill the empty container of outer space, considering we allegedly are floating in outer space (an open container) with no other container around earth

the ONLY rebuttal is going to be you reifying gravity, as though it exists, but to anyone intellectually honest this will be a difficult discussion to go down, considering how retarded and full of lies the mainstream explanation of "gravity" even is

if you think you are 100% confident you're spinning on a globe, and you consider yourself to be an intellectually honest person capable of changing their mind with new information, i would ask that you consider watching something like this and seeing if you either solidify your current opinion or maybe open your mind to other possibilities: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hnrlyOvUcQ