>>12002432
You're getting really mad someone is threatening to take your pacifier away. Obviously you have no response here, you're just a dumb man baby that orbits real video games while never playing a single one for real. Never in your life will you work up the courage to beat a game for real. You don't understand what made old games good at all, you'll never understand what made them so appealing as a naive kid, the challenge of conquering those games, you're just gunna slog through casual crap with save states like a big fat rpg playing man baby.

>>719811335
>Hes playing based as fuck 00's FPS kino
I already played all those games 20 years ago. And I'm played them properly, actually learning them, with the difficulty cranked, and not mindlessly consuming flashy dogshit. Tourists and poseurs are obsessed with rushing through things and playing catch up, they don't care about anything in games that matter. These are the people who will say
>this shitty soulless doom knock off is better because it has a stripper in it
This is why /v/ is bad. It's the poseur milennials who ruined it.

>>719227637
He sure did.

>>719146748
I'm not really interested in making an argument. If you think walking 20 miles to pass 2 speech checks and move onto the next point of interest is peak gameplay then you have a very long way to go.

>>719108794
/vr/ is a useless board with zero discussion and vapid boring redditors who barely play anything. It has no purpose, its just /v/ but with even more retards nostalgic for bad casual games. Show me a single good thread on /vr/.