Search results for "223ca282f73c02334c1b5f63351d5ddd" in md5 (6)

/pol/ - How do we feel about Massie?
Anonymous United States No.514849326
>>514846716
>>514847147

Nice try, but I'll take the bait.

Use your brains for a second. Do you really think one guy and his khazar milkers gf could run an entire compromat ring by themselves?

Anyone was implicated in any public release of the dirt they had, will immediately claim any jury would be prejudiced against them? That's lawyer basics 101. They'd deny, claim false/doctored evidence, hearsay, and even entrapment (which compromat LITERALLY is). We're talking potentially hundreds of people, implicated across multiple locations from LA, to NYC, to the Caribbean, and possibly elsewhere.

And that's assuming that all the evidence the FBI collected hasn't been tampered with or "vanished" in the past six years.

Even if you got video of folks like Bill Clinton getting a bj from a 13 year old, what good is that, when the people who facilitated it all are either dead or more likely still out there? The Dutroux affair is another example, how they pinned him as a serial killer and had him locked up but only after he was soft released due to his connections. He was clearly a procurator/middle-man for a compromat ring, not unlike Epstein.

I'll repeat what I said, Massie is a well-meaning idiot who will end up losing it all by trying to stand on "principles" when any good lawyer knows you don't reveal crimes this serious and with this many people unless you have enough evidence to convict, especially if you don't know who else is operating within the blackmail ring.

Again, what good is it to bust some of the clients while leaving many of the operators go free or give them enough warning to pack up and relocate/flee?

>“Trust the plan only 2 more weeks until the god emperor checkmates in 4D chess!”
There won't be a checkmate you moron. It will be a slow and gradual dismantling, which probably won't make the news at all, if it happens at all.

There are no heroes in this game.
/tv/ - Thread 214273576
Anonymous No.214273935
>>214273576

No, it's actually pretty stupid as a life-form unless you're a nihilist.

It fills no biological niche outside of killing other life forms and adopting superficial traits, while keeping its narrow natural lethality intact (acid blood, senses, claws, tail, hivemind orientation). It appears that even its defecation is utilized to "build" its hive but without any beneficial resource (royal jelly, honey, etc).

So, basically, it's an overdeveloped insectoid that turns non-insectoid forms into insectoids. That's literally the anti-thesis of evolution, a giant step backwards in terms of biodiversity.

It's only "perfect" in the sense that it can kill damn near anything else, and that which it can't kill, it infests.

If you dropped xenomorphs on any world, it would eventually be terraformed into a barren rock as all other life forms are turned into xenomorph-type hybrids, thus killing most cycles of life we're familiar with. The only life-forms that would be viable would be insects, as anything bigger (but not big enough to infest) would be eaten by the xenomorphs for biomass to build hives. All the xenomorph needs is a life form that is dog-sized to human-sized, and it's going to eventually infest everything. And since they can swim, it means even marine animals aren't safe.

They're the higher-life form equivalent of a plague and serve no biological purpose outside of propagation of its own "form". Any biosphere that receives them will die. Even mankind at its most avaricious couldn't do what xenomorphs do to a planet, as there's no point where a queen will stop and go "Oh man, maybe we're bad for the planet, let's slow down a bit..." They will only stop when there's nothing left to eat.

Unless you're an edgelord that hates people and life itself, then xenomorph's are perfect.
/pol/ - Should trans people be allowed to own guns?
Anonymous United States No.514227782
>>514225224

No they aren't. Under the Gun Control Act of 1968, enforced by the ATF:

A person is prohibited from buying or possessing firearms if they have been “adjudicated as a mental defective” or “committed to a mental institution.” Adjudicated as a mental defective means a court, board, commission, or other lawful authority has determined that the person, due to mental illness, is a danger to themselves or others, or lacks the mental capacity to manage their own affairs. Committed to a mental institution means involuntary commitment by a court or other lawful authority. Voluntary treatment does not usually count.

Simply being diagnosed with a mental illness, seeing a therapist, or taking medication does not automatically disqualify someone from firearm ownership.

The problem isn't about labels, it's that troons should be declared mentally defective for their dysphoria and high suicide rates, because suicidal tendencies can be initiated by hurting others in the hopes of being killed yourself.

Troons shouldn't own guns. Period.

In a sane world, you wouldn't allow someone with suicidal tendencies to buy a firearm but, most municipalities do because they use those statistics as "gun deaths" so they can justify gun bans. "Even in death, they will serve a purpose," type evil shit. If the rules worked as intended, Seung Hui-Cho would have never gotten firearms, because he was batshit crazy. Same with Dylan Roof. The DC Sniper was exposed to chemicals that gave him Gulf War Syndrome and drove him crazy too.

They are purposefully letting the crazies run wild, so they have ammunition to ban firearms.

As soon as someone says, "I was born in the wrong body", they should be flagged and not allowed to process anything from NICS but, due to political pressure, they are allowed to buy guns.

Liberal areas are the most 2A and anti-2A areas simultaneously, because they're playing games.
/k/ - Thread 64134794
Anonymous No.64144495
>>64134794

There is no "best". MA is broken down into four basic disciplines and it's up to the person to develop these skills:

>Strikes
Punches, kicks, knees, elbows, fingers, palms, backfists, knife-hands, knuckles, etc. Easiest to learn, hardest to master because the hard part of strikes is learning how to "feel" distance. Knowing when you can throw a strike and reliably hit what you're aiming at, while your opponent is trying really hard to not get hit. The faster you strike, the less power (generally) that you have. Learning to balance speed, distance, and accuracy is hard. This is why most recommend Traditional Boxing or Muay Thai as a "beginner" style, you learn all of that early, especially since it branches into:
>Throws
This includes takedowns. Judo, Aikido, Wrestling are great places to start. Throws are REALLY hard to pull off well because people are generally not keen on you tossing them around, and doing it wrong risks you injuring yourself more than your opponent. These styles also teach you:
>Holds
Jiujitsu is still the best for learning how to hold or tie someone up with just your hands. Holds are surprisingly easy to learn but also hard to pull off, since people go apeshit when you catch them in a hold, especially one that hurts.
>Weapons
Most difficult discipline. Swords, sticks, and clubs take years to "master" but again, are easy to learn. Knives are a lifelong pursuit and you can still get fucked up by someone less experienced if they're willing to get hurt to hurt you and you aren't. This is why guns are called "the great equalizer", as it takes very little training in comparison (3 months of hard practice) vs. 3-5 years of hard practice for most hand-held weapons.
/pol/ - Thread 512569323
Anonymous No.512570212
/pol/ - /chug/ - Comfy Happening in Ukraine General #20777
Anonymous Serbia No.508338961
>"Bombs" Fordow
>Hehe, mission accomplished
>USA! USA!
>Wait, what?
>NOOOOOOOOOOO
>YOU CAN'T CLOSE THE HORMUZ STRAIT
>AAAAAAAAAAAAA
>CHINA, PLEASE, HELJP
Even the Amerigolems turn out to be giant pussies.
Is there anyone in this world with any balls left?