>>63927006
>>63926991
With some sources claiming that drones have up to 90% fatality rate in open fields, and OP's table showing 75% of all wounded coming from drone attacks, that would mean dead to wounded ratio is absolutely bonkers and pidor reality is quite grim.
Assuming literally 0 dead from artillery and small arms, with 90% fatality of drones, that would mean 6.7:1 dead to wounded. To get 2:1 dead to wounded, like that one zigger claimed, assuming more reasonable 1:5 for arty and small arms, drones would need to have ~72% fatality rate