>>149334067
You see, lolicons and shotacons would be accepted if their fetish was clearly fiction. "No no no, I understand sexualizing real minors is a problem. However, Bart/Lisa Simpson (random example) aren't actual reflections of real children, so I don't believe its pedophilic to want to fuck them. Just look at the art; nothing's sexualizing the fact that they're fictional minors here."
The problem is a lot of you guys are just weirdos. Its "grow a pair and accept the art of people sexualizing disgusting, upsetting, heinous actions", and to that most people would say "no" and accuse you of being the horrible thing you think we should just tolerate for some reason.
At the end of the day, if your fetish is fueled by reality, then it isn't "just fiction" and people were right about you. Loli/shota fags? Actual pedophiles. Gore fags? Actual psychopaths/sociopaths. In this case "growing a pair" would just mean "accurately pointing to people and saying 'yes, they're actually pedophiles/dangerous people'".