Search results for "292abec30d7b73c7e5f1c4e8c31856a6" in md5 (6)

/co/ - Off-model appreciation thread
Anonymous No.150142083
>>150141883
The answer is no, but not because she's off model. She isn't Nicole because she's a creation by the fans and not the original creator. No fan made Nicole is the real Nicole as the fan Nicole cannot advance Nicole's character in canon. Its all playing pretend and, at best, the Nicoles created by fans can only advance their own stories in their own canon separate from the official Gumball works.
/v/ - Thread 715921378
Anonymous No.715926137
>>715921378
depends on how much plot armor he has. "Realistically" bat gets smoked by anybody with superspeed, has nukes, eye lazers from space, can just chuck him into space, etc. Like he stands no chance at all vs a doomsday or cyborg superman. Luthor is interesting because it's a chess match and often wins somehow even when he loses
/co/ - Thread 149469282
Anonymous No.149469324
>>149469282
depends on how much plot armor he has. "Realistically" bat gets smoked by anybody with superspeed, has nukes, eye lazers from space, can just chuck him into space, etc. Like he stands no chance at all vs a doomsday or cyborg superman. Luthor is interesting because it's a chess match and often wins somehow even when he loses
/x/ - /loa/ - Law of Assumption and Manifestation General, Lessons Learned Edition
Anonymous No.40695773
>go to r/nevillegoddardcritics to see what it's like
>Literal mouth breathing retards complaining the law is fine
>Look at their methods
>90% of them stopped living their lives and putting in effort because the "law says anything is possible"
>Now salty they wasted months or years sitting in their room
I can't take this much retardation. This is why you actually read the fucking book. Nowhere does this nigga neville say lay in bed all day like a neet and encouraged us to live our lives to the fullest.
/tv/ - Thread 212532002
Anonymous No.212538576
>>212532002
Why isn't Chris Pine in more things?
/co/ - Thread 149333301
Anonymous No.149334458
>>149334067
You see, lolicons and shotacons would be accepted if their fetish was clearly fiction. "No no no, I understand sexualizing real minors is a problem. However, Bart/Lisa Simpson (random example) aren't actual reflections of real children, so I don't believe its pedophilic to want to fuck them. Just look at the art; nothing's sexualizing the fact that they're fictional minors here."

The problem is a lot of you guys are just weirdos. Its "grow a pair and accept the art of people sexualizing disgusting, upsetting, heinous actions", and to that most people would say "no" and accuse you of being the horrible thing you think we should just tolerate for some reason.

At the end of the day, if your fetish is fueled by reality, then it isn't "just fiction" and people were right about you. Loli/shota fags? Actual pedophiles. Gore fags? Actual psychopaths/sociopaths. In this case "growing a pair" would just mean "accurately pointing to people and saying 'yes, they're actually pedophiles/dangerous people'".