I have an idea for an order of samurai / secret police for my setting.
They are recruited for a week or so per year. Members have a vow of anonymity - they are expelled if they reveal that they are in the order - and have a vow of poverty - they do not get paid. Furthermore, the order is infamous for enforcing laws in an extremely inconsistent manner, striking down civilians without rhyme or reason, while also conveniently being absent when raiders attack.
Is there a real-life organization I could use as inspiration to further flesh out this fictional order?
4chan Search
12 results for "2b3bee8de27691f7f9d241f159c6f9fc"
Warrior order inspiration
Will I get retroactive shit for the Career Progress stuff in E&E if I transfer my GTAO character?
I'm talking about the clothes, cars and money.
I'm talking about the clothes, cars and money.
Fuck chritcucks fuck the god of israel and fuck the demiurge
>>214781879
Why would you post videos of a random woman
Why would you post videos of a random woman
>>538382252
Give me a reason to play both games.
I fucking hate metroidvanias, but i've been listening to the OST of both games on youtube very casually and it looks like a beautifully crafted universe.
Give me a reason to play both games.
I fucking hate metroidvanias, but i've been listening to the OST of both games on youtube very casually and it looks like a beautifully crafted universe.
>>515084324
why did you make black and Indian people what the fuck where you thinking. Also why TF you make over 400,000 species of beetles.
why did you make black and Indian people what the fuck where you thinking. Also why TF you make over 400,000 species of beetles.
>>514997398
my fav pic saved from /his/
my fav pic saved from /his/
>>514921710
Yeah I'm not even Indian I just made this thread cause its funny larping as one
Yeah I'm not even Indian I just made this thread cause its funny larping as one
Answer I gave to a Catholic who said that God does not create evil:
"God does not create evil."
Isaiah 45:7
7I form the light and create darkness,
I bring peace (well, shalom) and bring disaster (evil, rah in Hebrew);
I, the Lord, do all these things.
"Ahh, but I'm Catholic, the Bible for me is just an accessory that I use when convenient."
Then throw that book away altogether and openly embrace Plato and Aristotle. Because always needing to resort to both to defend religion in the face of biblical madness is laughable.
"What is absurd in the Bible I say is metaphor or that it needs to go through exegesis."
Then it's easy...just accept what is convenient.
And even then it would be a problem, because Thomas Aquinas himself, whom you love to quote but don't actually read, said that proving an Aristotelian First Cause or Platonic Supreme Good (an abstraction that would give existence to reality by sustaining it) would NOT PROVE CHRISTIANITY AT ALL.
Aquinas himself says this. That Christianity will always be a matter of pure faith, because its philosophy can in no way justify Christianity, only serving to say that there was a "first flick" that gave rise to the universe.
This is what I like about Protestants. They read the Bible, see that it's all madness, that it's full of absurdities—from incest to God ordering the killing of babies and splitting pregnant women in half, from a flying Jew sitting on clouds to a talking donkey—but they say, "Okay, my religion is madness, and that's just the way it is, and I'll follow it anyway!"
Now Catholics are ashamed of their own holy book.
"God does not create evil."
Isaiah 45:7
7I form the light and create darkness,
I bring peace (well, shalom) and bring disaster (evil, rah in Hebrew);
I, the Lord, do all these things.
"Ahh, but I'm Catholic, the Bible for me is just an accessory that I use when convenient."
Then throw that book away altogether and openly embrace Plato and Aristotle. Because always needing to resort to both to defend religion in the face of biblical madness is laughable.
"What is absurd in the Bible I say is metaphor or that it needs to go through exegesis."
Then it's easy...just accept what is convenient.
And even then it would be a problem, because Thomas Aquinas himself, whom you love to quote but don't actually read, said that proving an Aristotelian First Cause or Platonic Supreme Good (an abstraction that would give existence to reality by sustaining it) would NOT PROVE CHRISTIANITY AT ALL.
Aquinas himself says this. That Christianity will always be a matter of pure faith, because its philosophy can in no way justify Christianity, only serving to say that there was a "first flick" that gave rise to the universe.
This is what I like about Protestants. They read the Bible, see that it's all madness, that it's full of absurdities—from incest to God ordering the killing of babies and splitting pregnant women in half, from a flying Jew sitting on clouds to a talking donkey—but they say, "Okay, my religion is madness, and that's just the way it is, and I'll follow it anyway!"
Now Catholics are ashamed of their own holy book.
