4chan Search
18 results for "2bcdbfd1a621c88e63af8324423d30b3"
What does blaming black people for violent crime have to do with being a Nazi?
>>520273144
There isn't such a thing as race.
I just don't want to be around people who don't look like me.
It's an aesthetic choice.
My pronouns are me/mine.
Respect them pls.
There isn't such a thing as race.
I just don't want to be around people who don't look like me.
It's an aesthetic choice.
My pronouns are me/mine.
Respect them pls.
>>520271277
Because marriage is a completely unnatural arrangement.
Men and women are biological opposites, but our struggles are equivalent.
A man's test is the world around him.
A woman's test is retaining a man's loyalty and affection.
The whole of women's biological firmware evolved under the condition of never being guaranteed a man's affection.
>You need a man for survival and comfort
>You know you are going to get worse-looking as you age
>You had better do what you can to mitigate that
>At the same time, you had better find a way to treat him well enough and add enough value to his life that he keeps you around
Marriage eliminates that entire framework.
It grants legally-enforced assurances of survival and comfort to women in exchange and punishes the more financially-secure partner (usually the man) if the covenant violated.
This seems like a good thing at face value, but what it actually does is strips the woman of any real incentive to remain on her best behavior. It also strips the man of agency in the relationship, which makes the woman less attractive to him.
I cannot list a single way in which marriage, in its current form, is not positively counterproductive for the man involved.
Because marriage is a completely unnatural arrangement.
Men and women are biological opposites, but our struggles are equivalent.
A man's test is the world around him.
A woman's test is retaining a man's loyalty and affection.
The whole of women's biological firmware evolved under the condition of never being guaranteed a man's affection.
>You need a man for survival and comfort
>You know you are going to get worse-looking as you age
>You had better do what you can to mitigate that
>At the same time, you had better find a way to treat him well enough and add enough value to his life that he keeps you around
Marriage eliminates that entire framework.
It grants legally-enforced assurances of survival and comfort to women in exchange and punishes the more financially-secure partner (usually the man) if the covenant violated.
This seems like a good thing at face value, but what it actually does is strips the woman of any real incentive to remain on her best behavior. It also strips the man of agency in the relationship, which makes the woman less attractive to him.
I cannot list a single way in which marriage, in its current form, is not positively counterproductive for the man involved.
>>520218714
>you amendments don't mean shit to them
They don't need to. They just need to mean shit to everyone else. And they do. They've been challenged and upheld hundreds of times by the Supreme Court, in every context you can think of.
No person in the United States has ever faced criminal conviction and punishment for speech alone, provided that speech didn't constitute direct and unambiguous conspiracy against the US govt, threats of violence, or incitements to violence.
It doesn't surprise me that a pasty, crooked-toothed gruel-eating faggot like you would have little faith in the longevity of the rights we hold dear; after all, it was your ancestors who hung around to dutifully lick the kings boots while ours left for greener pastures 300 years ago.
>you amendments don't mean shit to them
They don't need to. They just need to mean shit to everyone else. And they do. They've been challenged and upheld hundreds of times by the Supreme Court, in every context you can think of.
No person in the United States has ever faced criminal conviction and punishment for speech alone, provided that speech didn't constitute direct and unambiguous conspiracy against the US govt, threats of violence, or incitements to violence.
It doesn't surprise me that a pasty, crooked-toothed gruel-eating faggot like you would have little faith in the longevity of the rights we hold dear; after all, it was your ancestors who hung around to dutifully lick the kings boots while ours left for greener pastures 300 years ago.
>>520206882
If I'm guessing, it's probably just that Nick Fuentes hates jews and Josef Stalin purged a shit ton of jews.
If I'm guessing, it's probably just that Nick Fuentes hates jews and Josef Stalin purged a shit ton of jews.
I've been saying that automakers are doomed for like 3 years now.
People poo-pooed me back then, but now everyone is seeing it play out in real time.
There has not been one new thing that they've come up with in the last 15 years that has been a true value-add.
Every piece of new tech they put into these late model vehicles represents a negligible improvement to the user experience and at the same time needlessly complicates and drives up costs of individual parts and components, or creates a single-bid bottleneck for dealer-only maintenance and repairs, or tethers an amenity (like in-dash navigation, remote start, etc) to a monthly subscription payment so that the manufacturer can continue to tax you for the vehicle you've chosen to buy from them.
This is part of a broader trend in products manufacturing by western companies.
One of the iron laws of design and engineering is Occam's Razor:
>Accomplish the task by the simplest, most efficient, and least costly means necessary
Most mechanically-driven consumer products were optimized decades ago.
There is no need to tether proprietary network-integrated digital circuitry that relays data to the manufacturer to a mechanical part or system; that makes the product worse for the owner, not better.
A car needs to be simple, relatively fuel-efficient, and require as little and as simple a maintenance schedule as possible.
It needs to go, stop, and maybe play music if you have to be in it for a while.
Any add-ons or "tech advancements" beyond that are completely superfluous and provide no real benefit.
People poo-pooed me back then, but now everyone is seeing it play out in real time.
There has not been one new thing that they've come up with in the last 15 years that has been a true value-add.
Every piece of new tech they put into these late model vehicles represents a negligible improvement to the user experience and at the same time needlessly complicates and drives up costs of individual parts and components, or creates a single-bid bottleneck for dealer-only maintenance and repairs, or tethers an amenity (like in-dash navigation, remote start, etc) to a monthly subscription payment so that the manufacturer can continue to tax you for the vehicle you've chosen to buy from them.
This is part of a broader trend in products manufacturing by western companies.
One of the iron laws of design and engineering is Occam's Razor:
>Accomplish the task by the simplest, most efficient, and least costly means necessary
Most mechanically-driven consumer products were optimized decades ago.
There is no need to tether proprietary network-integrated digital circuitry that relays data to the manufacturer to a mechanical part or system; that makes the product worse for the owner, not better.
A car needs to be simple, relatively fuel-efficient, and require as little and as simple a maintenance schedule as possible.
It needs to go, stop, and maybe play music if you have to be in it for a while.
Any add-ons or "tech advancements" beyond that are completely superfluous and provide no real benefit.
>>519840167
Fine faggot
Fine faggot
Watch design is cool, but watchmakers and dealers are some of the scummiest businesses on the fucking planet.
>Buy a watch from Citizen, who don't have nearly the reputation for fuckery that European mfg's do.
>Decent watch, sticker price about $1000.
>Break a spring bar in the wrist band, proprietary part, need a replacement
>Contact their customer service department.
>"Oh yeah sure, we can help you with that. Do you think is the right part?"
>Not sure.
>"No problem, just send us a few photos of the linkages where the part is, we'll take care of it"
>They send a link for payment and shipping
>$2 for the bar, $18 for insured, expedited shipping.
>Pay up
>Receive nothing for a month
>Email them
>"Oh sorry, we forgot to tell you it's on backorder. 6-8 weeks to ship"
It's been 6 months. I've emailed them multiple times, and each time I get the same non-response about how they don't have it in yet.
These slimy fucking faggots take your money and then hold replacements out of stock hoping you'll just get frustrated and buy another watch from them.
Google the issue and there are literally hundreds of customer service/parts requests that went down the same exact fucking way.
If I knew where the CEO of this company went for lunch during the week, I'd show up there and knock his fucking front teeth out.
Anyway, I'm done with watches.
Dealing with this brand of disingenuous money-grubbing cunts isn't worth owning a cool-looking piece of jewelry.
>Buy a watch from Citizen, who don't have nearly the reputation for fuckery that European mfg's do.
>Decent watch, sticker price about $1000.
>Break a spring bar in the wrist band, proprietary part, need a replacement
>Contact their customer service department.
>"Oh yeah sure, we can help you with that. Do you think is the right part?"
>Not sure.
>"No problem, just send us a few photos of the linkages where the part is, we'll take care of it"
>They send a link for payment and shipping
>$2 for the bar, $18 for insured, expedited shipping.
>Pay up
>Receive nothing for a month
>Email them
>"Oh sorry, we forgot to tell you it's on backorder. 6-8 weeks to ship"
It's been 6 months. I've emailed them multiple times, and each time I get the same non-response about how they don't have it in yet.
These slimy fucking faggots take your money and then hold replacements out of stock hoping you'll just get frustrated and buy another watch from them.
Google the issue and there are literally hundreds of customer service/parts requests that went down the same exact fucking way.
If I knew where the CEO of this company went for lunch during the week, I'd show up there and knock his fucking front teeth out.
Anyway, I'm done with watches.
Dealing with this brand of disingenuous money-grubbing cunts isn't worth owning a cool-looking piece of jewelry.
>>519624503
Bill Gates is the largest owner of farmland in the United States.
He pays property taxes on it.
Should the entities he owns through be able to vote in elections.
Goldman Sachs owns 200 West Street in Battery Park, the most valuable building NYC.
Should GS be able to vote in elections?
How many votes should each of these entities have?
>>519624886
It is obvious from your viewpoints and your writing style that you're no older than 20.
You need to lurk moar and learn how the world actually works before you opine on politics.
Voting is an ineffectual carrot that certain political systems toss out to the general public that make them believe they have a say in national and global affairs.
In reality, every person and policy option you are allowed to vote on is narrowly bracketed and predetermined by people who finance campaigns of individual politicians.
Nobody in Snow Mexico voted for tens of thousands of Chinese to immigrate freely and unchecked. They didn't do so for Indians either.
Nobody wants this outcome, nor do they want people in office who support it.
If voting was effective in the way you believe it does, none of that would ever have happened. Not even for a second.
Just be quiet and learn to notice patterns when they aren't explicitly stated, man.
You will be better off for it.
Bill Gates is the largest owner of farmland in the United States.
He pays property taxes on it.
Should the entities he owns through be able to vote in elections.
Goldman Sachs owns 200 West Street in Battery Park, the most valuable building NYC.
Should GS be able to vote in elections?
How many votes should each of these entities have?
>>519624886
It is obvious from your viewpoints and your writing style that you're no older than 20.
You need to lurk moar and learn how the world actually works before you opine on politics.
Voting is an ineffectual carrot that certain political systems toss out to the general public that make them believe they have a say in national and global affairs.
In reality, every person and policy option you are allowed to vote on is narrowly bracketed and predetermined by people who finance campaigns of individual politicians.
Nobody in Snow Mexico voted for tens of thousands of Chinese to immigrate freely and unchecked. They didn't do so for Indians either.
Nobody wants this outcome, nor do they want people in office who support it.
If voting was effective in the way you believe it does, none of that would ever have happened. Not even for a second.
Just be quiet and learn to notice patterns when they aren't explicitly stated, man.
You will be better off for it.
>>519538684
>high-IQ white male leftist
Lol wut.
The men are just falling in line with what women express that they want.
It's the age-old "maybe if I'm agreeable enough, she'll toss some pussy my way" gambit that never works.
Women support this kind of shit because they instinctively despise artificial constraints against open competition between men.
To them, rules, borders, cultural conventions, traditions, etc are nothing more than obstacles to mate selection.
All the vast majority of them want is to stand at the finish line of the race and fuck whoever wins it.
And they don't really care what color his skin is or what he believes.
>high-IQ white male leftist
Lol wut.
The men are just falling in line with what women express that they want.
It's the age-old "maybe if I'm agreeable enough, she'll toss some pussy my way" gambit that never works.
Women support this kind of shit because they instinctively despise artificial constraints against open competition between men.
To them, rules, borders, cultural conventions, traditions, etc are nothing more than obstacles to mate selection.
All the vast majority of them want is to stand at the finish line of the race and fuck whoever wins it.
And they don't really care what color his skin is or what he believes.
>>519423303
We're Americans.
Our entire fucking existence is predicated ont he phrase
>"you can't tell us what to do"
Get used to it.
We're Americans.
Our entire fucking existence is predicated ont he phrase
>"you can't tell us what to do"
Get used to it.
>>519068386
>when we weaponize the justice system against our political opponents its fine because we're the good guys
>when drumpf does the same thing we did its bad because he bad
Trump can do what he is doing because a bunch of short sighted retards did it first and now they are whining about the consequences of their actions. Please stop being retarded.
>when we weaponize the justice system against our political opponents its fine because we're the good guys
>when drumpf does the same thing we did its bad because he bad
Trump can do what he is doing because a bunch of short sighted retards did it first and now they are whining about the consequences of their actions. Please stop being retarded.
>>518980119
Promoting ethnic and cultural uniformity where I live is the best way to make the lives of those around me better.
/thread
Promoting ethnic and cultural uniformity where I live is the best way to make the lives of those around me better.
/thread
>>518971924
Sorry, 'racist' is a marxist slur used by intellectually lazy and dishonest pussies who think that perpetual victimhood is a positive character trait.
Musk is just trying to push white people into using it to increase its commonality in the public lexicon.
You will never hear me use it.
Thanks for playing, faggots.
Sorry, 'racist' is a marxist slur used by intellectually lazy and dishonest pussies who think that perpetual victimhood is a positive character trait.
Musk is just trying to push white people into using it to increase its commonality in the public lexicon.
You will never hear me use it.
Thanks for playing, faggots.
>>518861111
In all likelihood, no. Not for a very, very long time anyway.
We don't have anywhere near the level of technology necessary to ferry human beings to extraneous solar systems.
The fastest space probe ever built took 30 years to exit our solar system. It would take roughly another 80,000 years to reach the next closest solar system. We don't have cryo sleep, or pulse engines to propel spacecraft any faster, or machinery capable of bending space time to shorten travel.
For now, the prospect would be nearly 3,000 subsequent generations of people, living in confined quarters on a ship, reproducing, and raising children who would all live and die on that ship, all successfully having been indoctrinated with the belief that their life was not a cruel and horrible waste, and that the eventuality of the mission that neither they, nor their children, nor their grandchildren would ever witness, was worthwhile.
Forget about mechanical or logistical concerns, or avoiding hazards in space. The likelihood that one of those people, somewhere along the way, wouldn't say "fuck this shit" and blow a hole in the side of the spaceship, killing everyone on board, is microscopically low.
In all likelihood, no. Not for a very, very long time anyway.
We don't have anywhere near the level of technology necessary to ferry human beings to extraneous solar systems.
The fastest space probe ever built took 30 years to exit our solar system. It would take roughly another 80,000 years to reach the next closest solar system. We don't have cryo sleep, or pulse engines to propel spacecraft any faster, or machinery capable of bending space time to shorten travel.
For now, the prospect would be nearly 3,000 subsequent generations of people, living in confined quarters on a ship, reproducing, and raising children who would all live and die on that ship, all successfully having been indoctrinated with the belief that their life was not a cruel and horrible waste, and that the eventuality of the mission that neither they, nor their children, nor their grandchildren would ever witness, was worthwhile.
Forget about mechanical or logistical concerns, or avoiding hazards in space. The likelihood that one of those people, somewhere along the way, wouldn't say "fuck this shit" and blow a hole in the side of the spaceship, killing everyone on board, is microscopically low.
>>516604379
There is one and only one characteristic that separates us from the rest of the animal world and underpins the laws and customs that make up what we consider to be humanity and civilization:
Understanding that there is a hard line between non-violent and violent behavior that is sacrosanct and cannot be crossed, for any reason.
You cannot punch someone in the face for saying things you don't like.
You cannot imprison someone for expressing the wrong opinions.
You cannot kill someone for being critical of you.
It is the slipperiest slope that could ever exist, and which no human is, or ever has been, or ever will be equipped to maintian footing on.
It is higher on the mantle of human philosophical priority than reverence for God himself.
Anyone who treads on that, any man or group of men who attempts to police and punish words and ideas corporally, merits genocide.
To have his bloodline wiped out; his wife, children, and loved ones sent to hell alongside him.
There is one and only one characteristic that separates us from the rest of the animal world and underpins the laws and customs that make up what we consider to be humanity and civilization:
Understanding that there is a hard line between non-violent and violent behavior that is sacrosanct and cannot be crossed, for any reason.
You cannot punch someone in the face for saying things you don't like.
You cannot imprison someone for expressing the wrong opinions.
You cannot kill someone for being critical of you.
It is the slipperiest slope that could ever exist, and which no human is, or ever has been, or ever will be equipped to maintian footing on.
It is higher on the mantle of human philosophical priority than reverence for God himself.
Anyone who treads on that, any man or group of men who attempts to police and punish words and ideas corporally, merits genocide.
To have his bloodline wiped out; his wife, children, and loved ones sent to hell alongside him.
>>515127961
I'll tell you what exactly happened. You know how chimpanzees eat other primates and monkeys? Same here. Those ancient genes found in abdundance in niggers, from prehistoric times when the homo erectus engaged in the consumption of other hominids spoke to him. He's seen something weak, fragile, and succulent in front of him, with her back to him no less. Predator instinct in the most literal sense of the word kicked in. "Sneak up on it. Kill it." If it was in Africa, where he'd be even less bound by the confines of civility than in the US, he'd have devoured her flesh on the spot, too.
I'll tell you what exactly happened. You know how chimpanzees eat other primates and monkeys? Same here. Those ancient genes found in abdundance in niggers, from prehistoric times when the homo erectus engaged in the consumption of other hominids spoke to him. He's seen something weak, fragile, and succulent in front of him, with her back to him no less. Predator instinct in the most literal sense of the word kicked in. "Sneak up on it. Kill it." If it was in Africa, where he'd be even less bound by the confines of civility than in the US, he'd have devoured her flesh on the spot, too.