>>82323515
I think you and many others have severely misunderstood the point of all this.

the culture of this sanctuary has gone way beyond "muh lonely feefees" and evolved to the complete dissection of gynocentrism and what we call "womanhood". a lot of the debased 'i'm so heckin lonely' threads are created by glowies to trivialize incel memetics.

everyone with a dime to add about the state of monogamy (women) these days are welcomed to this sanctuary, whether it's an inexperienced loner, an experienced lover, a failed normie, a husband, a divorcee, a murderer, a rapist, a tranny, a slightly self-aware whore etc...

i just don't think we're on the same wavelength here

"Real women" are the only obstacle between man and the true love that poets/religions have written about.

Pornographic escapism is a necessary evil.

Until sacred monogamy becomes the end all be all again, everything is permissible and nothing has "inherent value".

Now you realize why AI acceleration MUST collapse the entirety of the internet and society

>>81871707
lol keep simping boi

they dont want you to know so heres a reminder

Sacred monogamy is civilized and transcendent

Civilizations that stray away from it ends up becoming more chaotic and gross

Women seem to have an ontological issue with sacred monogamy. They are antiromantic animals in their way of monkeybranching and seeing every relationship as disposable. Every romantic poem written by men in history was clearly not about "real women"

Does this mean they're not civilized and transcendent?

Why does gynocentrism increase when spiritual discipline decreases? Why are over 30 bmi whores considered "average'? Do we dare ponder upon the old abrahamic patriarchs again at the expense of "girl feelings"?

>>81772747
no. i dont trust women anymore, never again. i will only use one as birthmachine to get a son that i can have fun with

women live completely different lives than us it's unreal