>>521092605
truly if you repost this one more time it will become true
>Again, it is written (Rom 9:5) that Christ is of the Jews according to the flesh, who is over all things
>As is related Gen. 17, Abraham received from God and at the same time both his name and the commandment of circumcision. For this reason it was customary among the Jews to name children on the very day of circumcision, as though before being circumcised they had not as yet perfect existence: just as now also children receive their names in Baptism. Wherefore on Prov. 4:3, I was my father’s son, tender, and as an only son in the sight of my mother, the gloss says: Why does Solomon call himself an only son in the sight of his mother, when Scripture testifies that he had an elder brother of the same mother, unless it be that the latter died unnamed soon after birth? Therefore it was that Christ received His name at the time of His circumcision.
>I answer that, It was fitting that Christ’s preaching, whether through Himself or through His apostles, should be directed at first to the Jews alone. First, in order to show that by His coming the promises were fulfilled which had been made to the Jews of old, and not to the Gentiles. Thus the Apostle says (Rom 15:8): I say that Christ . . . was minister of the circumcision, i.e., the apostle and preacher of the Jews, for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers.
>although the salvation, which was to come through Christ, was prepared for all nations, yet it was necessary that Christ should be born of one people, which, for this reason, was privileged above other peoples; according to Rm. 9:4: To whom, namely the Jews, belongeth the adoption as of children (of God) ... and the testament, and the giving of the Law...whose are the fathers, and of whom is Christ according to the flesh. - T. Aquinas
4chan Search
16 results for "302b4f3fffbb36d3458763b6e3c1776b"
so true sis! it's only after all a religion that considers the jews an ethnic group whom the literal creator of the universe HAD chosen as superior herrenrasse to rule above the rest, and then *wink wink* he changes his mind, that's peak antisemitism for you, nobody could see it coming that eventually this would lead whatever group embraced it to become slaves to said group
>>520577493
the classic: if I add as many -ites as I can to ancient subtribes of penis mutilators jewsus the circumcised torah abiding passover celebrating descendant of judah won't be a jew!
the absolute fucking state, and you don't even realize failing this litmus test over and over again only damages your cause
the classic: if I add as many -ites as I can to ancient subtribes of penis mutilators jewsus the circumcised torah abiding passover celebrating descendant of judah won't be a jew!
the absolute fucking state, and you don't even realize failing this litmus test over and over again only damages your cause
>>520189819
your concession and complete intellectual humiliation is accepted
>that pic
*yaaaaaaaaaaawn*
>Again, it is written (Rom 9:5) that Christ is of the Jews according to the flesh, who is over all things
>As is related Gen. 17, Abraham received from God and at the same time both his name and the commandment of circumcision. For this reason it was customary among the Jews to name children on the very day of circumcision, as though before being circumcised they had not as yet perfect existence: just as now also children receive their names in Baptism. Wherefore on Prov. 4:3, I was my father’s son, tender, and as an only son in the sight of my mother, the gloss says: Why does Solomon call himself an only son in the sight of his mother, when Scripture testifies that he had an elder brother of the same mother, unless it be that the latter died unnamed soon after birth? Therefore it was that Christ received His name at the time of His circumcision.
>I answer that, It was fitting that Christ’s preaching, whether through Himself or through His apostles, should be directed at first to the Jews alone. First, in order to show that by His coming the promises were fulfilled which had been made to the Jews of old, and not to the Gentiles. Thus the Apostle says (Rom 15:8): I say that Christ . . . was minister of the circumcision, i.e., the apostle and preacher of the Jews, for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers.
>although the salvation, which was to come through Christ, was prepared for all nations, yet it was necessary that Christ should be born of one people, which, for this reason, was privileged above other peoples; according to Rm. 9:4: To whom, namely the Jews, belongeth the adoption as of children (of God) ... and the testament, and the giving of the Law...whose are the fathers, and of whom is Christ according to the flesh. - T. Aquinas
your concession and complete intellectual humiliation is accepted
>that pic
*yaaaaaaaaaaawn*
>Again, it is written (Rom 9:5) that Christ is of the Jews according to the flesh, who is over all things
>As is related Gen. 17, Abraham received from God and at the same time both his name and the commandment of circumcision. For this reason it was customary among the Jews to name children on the very day of circumcision, as though before being circumcised they had not as yet perfect existence: just as now also children receive their names in Baptism. Wherefore on Prov. 4:3, I was my father’s son, tender, and as an only son in the sight of my mother, the gloss says: Why does Solomon call himself an only son in the sight of his mother, when Scripture testifies that he had an elder brother of the same mother, unless it be that the latter died unnamed soon after birth? Therefore it was that Christ received His name at the time of His circumcision.
>I answer that, It was fitting that Christ’s preaching, whether through Himself or through His apostles, should be directed at first to the Jews alone. First, in order to show that by His coming the promises were fulfilled which had been made to the Jews of old, and not to the Gentiles. Thus the Apostle says (Rom 15:8): I say that Christ . . . was minister of the circumcision, i.e., the apostle and preacher of the Jews, for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers.
>although the salvation, which was to come through Christ, was prepared for all nations, yet it was necessary that Christ should be born of one people, which, for this reason, was privileged above other peoples; according to Rm. 9:4: To whom, namely the Jews, belongeth the adoption as of children (of God) ... and the testament, and the giving of the Law...whose are the fathers, and of whom is Christ according to the flesh. - T. Aquinas
>>519695337
nobody cares what brown filth like christians tell themselves to sell their ghastly nigger religion least of all little kids online, you worship a jew and consider abraham your father
nobody cares what brown filth like christians tell themselves to sell their ghastly nigger religion least of all little kids online, you worship a jew and consider abraham your father
>>18093509
Yeah, let's worship the jews twice as hard to spite the papists!
Yeah, let's worship the jews twice as hard to spite the papists!
>>18085267
>It’s why Europeans took all the Jewish neuroticism out of Christianity.
>all
More like 'some' at best. And the prots put most of it back in.
>It’s why Europeans took all the Jewish neuroticism out of Christianity.
>all
More like 'some' at best. And the prots put most of it back in.
>>18081289
What kind of German thinks jews are closest to God?
What kind of German thinks jews are closest to God?
>>518987967
>Again, it is written (Rom 9:5) that Christ is of the Jews according to the flesh, who is over all things
>As is related Gen. 17, Abraham received from God and at the same time both his name and the commandment of circumcision. For this reason it was customary among the Jews to name children on the very day of circumcision, as though before being circumcised they had not as yet perfect existence: just as now also children receive their names in Baptism. Wherefore on Prov. 4:3, I was my father’s son, tender, and as an only son in the sight of my mother, the gloss says: Why does Solomon call himself an only son in the sight of his mother, when Scripture testifies that he had an elder brother of the same mother, unless it be that the latter died unnamed soon after birth? Therefore it was that Christ received His name at the time of His circumcision.
>I answer that, It was fitting that Christ’s preaching, whether through Himself or through His apostles, should be directed at first to the Jews alone. First, in order to show that by His coming the promises were fulfilled which had been made to the Jews of old, and not to the Gentiles. Thus the Apostle says (Rom 15:8): I say that Christ . . . was minister of the circumcision, i.e., the apostle and preacher of the Jews, for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers.
>although the salvation, which was to come through Christ, was prepared for all nations, yet it was necessary that Christ should be born of one people, which, for this reason, was privileged above other peoples; according to Rm. 9:4: To whom, namely the Jews, belongeth the adoption as of children (of God) ... and the testament, and the giving of the Law...whose are the fathers, and of whom is Christ according to the flesh. - Thomas Aquinas
>Again, it is written (Rom 9:5) that Christ is of the Jews according to the flesh, who is over all things
>As is related Gen. 17, Abraham received from God and at the same time both his name and the commandment of circumcision. For this reason it was customary among the Jews to name children on the very day of circumcision, as though before being circumcised they had not as yet perfect existence: just as now also children receive their names in Baptism. Wherefore on Prov. 4:3, I was my father’s son, tender, and as an only son in the sight of my mother, the gloss says: Why does Solomon call himself an only son in the sight of his mother, when Scripture testifies that he had an elder brother of the same mother, unless it be that the latter died unnamed soon after birth? Therefore it was that Christ received His name at the time of His circumcision.
>I answer that, It was fitting that Christ’s preaching, whether through Himself or through His apostles, should be directed at first to the Jews alone. First, in order to show that by His coming the promises were fulfilled which had been made to the Jews of old, and not to the Gentiles. Thus the Apostle says (Rom 15:8): I say that Christ . . . was minister of the circumcision, i.e., the apostle and preacher of the Jews, for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers.
>although the salvation, which was to come through Christ, was prepared for all nations, yet it was necessary that Christ should be born of one people, which, for this reason, was privileged above other peoples; according to Rm. 9:4: To whom, namely the Jews, belongeth the adoption as of children (of God) ... and the testament, and the giving of the Law...whose are the fathers, and of whom is Christ according to the flesh. - Thomas Aquinas
>>18067615
I thought you groypers were larping as catholic? Did you get excommunicated?
I thought you groypers were larping as catholic? Did you get excommunicated?
>>518693906
>blah blah blah blah I'm a retarded shitskin who doesn't understand his own death cult
Yeah yeah we get it.
>blah blah blah blah I'm a retarded shitskin who doesn't understand his own death cult
Yeah yeah we get it.
>>514907822
Zambo care to tell me how many years passed from Luther since protestant christians welcomed them in england again?
Zambo care to tell me how many years passed from Luther since protestant christians welcomed them in england again?
>>510919222
he thinks if he outdoes his jewish owners in pulpil and linguistic trickery he will convince a single one with an IQ above the average christanzee(70)
but this is what one gets when interaction with /pol/ jews, a window into people far, far worse than jews by a large margin
he thinks if he outdoes his jewish owners in pulpil and linguistic trickery he will convince a single one with an IQ above the average christanzee(70)
but this is what one gets when interaction with /pol/ jews, a window into people far, far worse than jews by a large margin
>>508993751
That shit has been going on since Luther. He thought he can convert kikes and was all nice to them, he only sperged out when he realized they won't convert.
All (American) Evangelicals are golems
That shit has been going on since Luther. He thought he can convert kikes and was all nice to them, he only sperged out when he realized they won't convert.
All (American) Evangelicals are golems