>>520874949
>My instincts tell me he got off because the charges were trumped up metoo bull shit
He filmed the rape you retard. Try reading the articles sometime.
Honestly he deserves the death penalty just for being stupid enough to film the rape in the first place.
4chan Search
19 results for "389aa520c0b15e04c7cb4fb4899d3ad2"
Satingarse tendie brekkie this was
Exquisite, even X
Exquisite, even X
>>942078890
hi
hi
>film is completely and straight to the point with no message or lesson
/hoc/ is for frens
>>519190991
You can literally go to jail for killing one. Only in the satanic chambers of the abortion clinic is it somehow magically okay to murder one.
Hit a pregnant woman in your car? Charged with two murders.
As a Libertarian, you know abortion was started as a eugenics program to kill off negros. Every year more women kill their babies then all U.S. war casualties from all of our wars.
You can literally go to jail for killing one. Only in the satanic chambers of the abortion clinic is it somehow magically okay to murder one.
Hit a pregnant woman in your car? Charged with two murders.
As a Libertarian, you know abortion was started as a eugenics program to kill off negros. Every year more women kill their babies then all U.S. war casualties from all of our wars.
Why isn't more research being put into increasing existing human IQ in living persons/fetuses?
The explosive AI investment we are currently seeing would imply that there's a high amount of potential value to be created by an increase in access to intelligence. Wouldn't just altering the genes of existing people/their offspring be good, if not as mythical as the vague "AGI" these silicon valley types are looking for? I don't know enough about neuroscience/genetics research but I am curious if anyone on this board who has more knowledge would be willing to share their understanding and personal opinions on the subject. Also if you have any recommended reading on the topic that you could put in the thread for those interested, that would be greatly appreciated.
The explosive AI investment we are currently seeing would imply that there's a high amount of potential value to be created by an increase in access to intelligence. Wouldn't just altering the genes of existing people/their offspring be good, if not as mythical as the vague "AGI" these silicon valley types are looking for? I don't know enough about neuroscience/genetics research but I am curious if anyone on this board who has more knowledge would be willing to share their understanding and personal opinions on the subject. Also if you have any recommended reading on the topic that you could put in the thread for those interested, that would be greatly appreciated.
>>512201258
Kill all jews hahaha
Kill all jews hahaha
>>511408363
Bairisch/Österreicher (?) freind
Bairisch/Österreicher (?) freind
>>149737675
/hoc/ is for everyone
/hoc/ is for everyone
Join 4clan
>>211888763
ich nehm dein selbstgeschwuchtel mal als zeichen deiner ausgelöstheit
ich nehm dein selbstgeschwuchtel mal als zeichen deiner ausgelöstheit