>>64474960
We're honestly already there. Russia doesn't seem to have any significant number of fully functional MBTs left.
>>64477356
Yeah, the reality is that true MBT-on-MBT engagements nowadays happen at ranges that make POV footage impractical. The only close range MBT engagement I can think of is the Bradley vs T-90, where neither crew expected the engagement. And even that is still drone footage. Bradley won btw
Also I recall an early war engagement of two MBTs coming up on each other at very close range in a wooded area. Russian tank won that one by being the first to fire