>>532570614
>when you have the ability to win 100% of your games.
Also False

>>716264809
We can calculate that.
Maliss right now is forced to lose 22% of its games.
However, the deck is also terrible going second.
So only the going first winrate would really change, with the overall average changing a couple points. Overall, it'd get bumped up to A tier, but it'd still be weaker than Blue-Eyes.

>>716108831
You can stop Maliss with more than just Lancea. Regular handtraps will stop them just the same if you're not retarded, and the deck sucks going second. Lancea is just a free win cause it forces a turn skip.