>>724949012
>The screen isn't OLED and has ghosting. It's bad!
So you're saying that the Switch 2 screen, which according to tests is 50% slower than the Switch 1 screen, is good just because the product is selling well?
The Switch 2 screen isn't just bad, it would already be considered obsolete by 2010 standards for LCD TVs/monitors. It's probably the worst screen you can buy right now, even those $80 Chinese handhelds probably have better screens, and I'm not kidding.
4chan Search
4 results for "3f9c9668bd1dfc7def485c277680f2e4"
LCD screens may look OK depending on lighting conditions, image calibration, etc. But there is a price to pay. The better the image, the worse the characteristics suitable for gaming. That's why every television has a game mode, and the image in that mode is complete garbage when compared to other modes.
The Nintendo Switch 2 screen is a total disaster when it comes to motion clarity, being considerably worse than the Switch 1 (50% slower), which was already a total disaster.
In my opinion, Nintendo didn't want people to compare the Switch 2 screen with the Switch 1 OLED screen and see a huge downgrade, so they sacrificed response time to try to make the screen look nicer. The result is a screen whose performance for games is comparable to things from 2005.
The Nintendo Switch 2 screen is a total disaster when it comes to motion clarity, being considerably worse than the Switch 1 (50% slower), which was already a total disaster.
In my opinion, Nintendo didn't want people to compare the Switch 2 screen with the Switch 1 OLED screen and see a huge downgrade, so they sacrificed response time to try to make the screen look nicer. The result is a screen whose performance for games is comparable to things from 2005.
Because the popularization of video games has brought normalfags who want immersive, long interactive experiences where they feel like they are progressing and building something big.
Have you ever noticed that most video game consumers don't consume things like, I don't know... chess or backgammon boards, in the same avid way? The reason is because most people aren't really interested in learning the rules of a game and starting to refine their skills, they're interested in epic experiences full of audio-visual content.
That's why I always say: AIs, if they continue to evolve, won't improve video games, they'll make video games obsolete. That's because AIs that can, for example, generate interactive videos in real time, will be infinitely more appealing to normalfags. They will abandon video games en masse as soon as AIs are offering epic narratives for them to immerse themselves in and interact with. And then you'll see the video games industry shrink and become tiny, with most games becoming action and arcade-focused.
Have you ever noticed that most video game consumers don't consume things like, I don't know... chess or backgammon boards, in the same avid way? The reason is because most people aren't really interested in learning the rules of a game and starting to refine their skills, they're interested in epic experiences full of audio-visual content.
That's why I always say: AIs, if they continue to evolve, won't improve video games, they'll make video games obsolete. That's because AIs that can, for example, generate interactive videos in real time, will be infinitely more appealing to normalfags. They will abandon video games en masse as soon as AIs are offering epic narratives for them to immerse themselves in and interact with. And then you'll see the video games industry shrink and become tiny, with most games becoming action and arcade-focused.
>>713790538
>Nobody complained about the screen until the digital foundry video
Except for the guys who were complaining, even with photographic and video evidence. I posted comparisons on /v/ as soon as I saw the first evidence on Internet (before any videos were posted online), but the same mentally challenged autistic manchild do his favorite damage control.
And yes, the vast majority of people are retarded, they really don't realize that a screen they're using is abysmal even though they're getting fucking nauseous from it, as one anon who posted here said (and he thinks the nausea is because of the detail and not because of the blur).
>Nobody complained about the screen until the digital foundry video
Except for the guys who were complaining, even with photographic and video evidence. I posted comparisons on /v/ as soon as I saw the first evidence on Internet (before any videos were posted online), but the same mentally challenged autistic manchild do his favorite damage control.
And yes, the vast majority of people are retarded, they really don't realize that a screen they're using is abysmal even though they're getting fucking nauseous from it, as one anon who posted here said (and he thinks the nausea is because of the detail and not because of the blur).