>>718613127
Keep seething for me buddy, lol.

>>533215357
>Rare's lore for Cranky's backstory not being canon ≠ Rare is le bad!
It's ok to be retarded anon, don't worry about it.

>>531577350
That's from an third party guide book published in 1994. You've been told this numerous times and yet are still trying to present it as official just to justify your fanfic.