4chan Search
7 results for "45cf39f2c8425d8cb6dd21fc7f4744db"
>>520814975
Kek this shit writes itself doesn’t it.
We don’t even need to play their game. Their own females will do it for them…
Kek this shit writes itself doesn’t it.
We don’t even need to play their game. Their own females will do it for them…
>>518867823
I’m not gonna lie, playing as a pajeet in this world is like playing doom on ultra nightmare difficulty, but like playing doom on ultra nightmare it certainly gets the blood pumping nicely and feels damn good when you win a level.
The problem is, they envy the result, but not the blood, sweat and tears that go into it, and that, is why they will ALWAYS fail.
Once you’ve beaten Melania blade of Miquella you don’t fear world bosses anymore, you are excited by the challenge, you want to be challenged.
That’s the big difference I think
I’m not gonna lie, playing as a pajeet in this world is like playing doom on ultra nightmare difficulty, but like playing doom on ultra nightmare it certainly gets the blood pumping nicely and feels damn good when you win a level.
The problem is, they envy the result, but not the blood, sweat and tears that go into it, and that, is why they will ALWAYS fail.
Once you’ve beaten Melania blade of Miquella you don’t fear world bosses anymore, you are excited by the challenge, you want to be challenged.
That’s the big difference I think
>>515322869
(((Nominal GDP))) is banks passing billions of $ of digits between each others computers and calling it a (((GDP))).
That's not the real economy.
(((Nominal GDP))) is banks passing billions of $ of digits between each others computers and calling it a (((GDP))).
That's not the real economy.
>>513951695
>in fact the GDP would go up if 10,000 grubhub drivers got replaced by 1 dispatcher and 20,000 robots reaching twice as many customers.
The GDP only goes up if people are spending more money, retard. If you replaced 40% of the labor force with robots, those 40% would now be out of a job. Which means not only would they stop spending money, but they'd be unable to pay their mortgages. The entire housing market would collapse, there would be mass foreclosures. Not only would the banks not be paid back, but they would take massive losses on all of their investments. There would be bank failures a thousand times worse than the 2007/2008 financial crisis.
The only way 40% of the workforce being replaced by robots would increase GDP is if those 40% found other jobs, or if the state intervened to boost demand. As I said, go read some Keynes you retarded nigger.
>in fact the GDP would go up if 10,000 grubhub drivers got replaced by 1 dispatcher and 20,000 robots reaching twice as many customers.
The GDP only goes up if people are spending more money, retard. If you replaced 40% of the labor force with robots, those 40% would now be out of a job. Which means not only would they stop spending money, but they'd be unable to pay their mortgages. The entire housing market would collapse, there would be mass foreclosures. Not only would the banks not be paid back, but they would take massive losses on all of their investments. There would be bank failures a thousand times worse than the 2007/2008 financial crisis.
The only way 40% of the workforce being replaced by robots would increase GDP is if those 40% found other jobs, or if the state intervened to boost demand. As I said, go read some Keynes you retarded nigger.
>>513665173
I’m a pajeet, with a masters degree in engineering from a top university, I applied to more than 2000 jobs and didn’t get a single response except rejection template non-personalised messages.
Where’s my DEI quota job?
Where is my special pajeet treatment I keep hearing so much about?
I’m a pajeet, with a masters degree in engineering from a top university, I applied to more than 2000 jobs and didn’t get a single response except rejection template non-personalised messages.
Where’s my DEI quota job?
Where is my special pajeet treatment I keep hearing so much about?
>>513468774
You're a kike.
You're a kike.