>>150007232
>Purchasing pre-made "Boy Brands." It should have worked, it was a no-brainer. They just couldn't help themselves.
But i cant understand is WHY did disney almost compulsively change everything that had male appeal in those boy brands to try and make it appeal to girls suddenly? From a business perspective it was marketing suicide

>>149998576
>The Amphibia creator went on a literal meltdown a few hours ago because Disney wanted to make shows catering to a younger male audience.
Sauce? I heard nothing about this so far. Really shows their true colors (heh) when cartoon creator like matt braly is pissed over media being made with young males in mind

Isn’t this hypocritical of Mike Stoklasa?

>He’s the one who ruined Star Wars by tricking people into hating the prequels, forcing Lucas to sell Star Wars, and convincing Disney to put JJ Abrams (and Simon Pegg) in charge of Star Wars and to never reference the Prequels for the longest time.

>He was the one who shilled Jurassic World and called it the best movie of the summer.

>He was the one who shilled JJ Abrams Star Trek movies and their dumb plots.

>He was the one who shilled the MCU, especially stuff like David Cohen Thor.

>He was the one demanding all White heterosexual relationships in movies be outlawed because of THE NOT GAYS.

>He was the one who demanded that the Rocketeer (and other legacy characters) be black women, which Hollywood caved into his demands

>He was the one defending Nepo Babies, calling them the master race and that they should be called legacy artists.

>He was the one shilling for crappy adult cartoons like Big Mouth, Lower Decks, and Rick and Morty.

He’s the one who ruined all franchises in Hollywood yet he is the one who acts like the victims?
Modern Hollywood is based off everything Mike has said yet he claims to not be responsible.