>>64125854
If you had half a brain cell in that noggin of yours not only would you see that wouldn't work, but you would have read the news after the victory of the taliban in afghanistan.
Not only were the more popular with the people than the american military wanted to admit, but a ton of their supporters lived in neighboring pakistan until the war was won.
Because of these two facts it retroactively reveals even genocide wouldn't properly work because their supporters are not only numerous across the civilian population, but a nearby nuclear armed state was one of the main ferry points to get weapons and supplies in.
You couldn't attempt to do to afghanistan what is being done in gaza, and even there that city is still defiant only further proving my point.
>>64125880
>>64126024
You retards would have caused the world to end decades ago, you don't just use nukes.
Not only would that immediately ruin the USA's prospects of having the world support them, but it would instantaneously push the rest of the world into the hands of russia and china.
Nation after nation would simply join a NATO equivalent out of fear of being the next victim.
More nations would also rush to create nukes at all costs, and more rogue nations like india may be willing to sell some of this knowledge in order to benefit.
As for pakistan they would either nuke us back or at least do damage to allies nearby.
You can't win a nuclear war in the modern era, you can only mitigate inevitable damage.
If pakistan was nuked they would retaliate in kind and even if their arsenal is smaller and weaker, it only takes one hit in a crucial area to do more damage than the entire afghanistan war was ever worth.
