>>105743974
We have this very same retarded thread each fucking week.
>I've used Leenuks for a gorillion years
No, you haven't. You just said that to make your post seem a bit more "reasonable" (it's not)
>Windows can easily debloat their system by editing the registry and using tools randoms put up on GitHub.
Normalfags don't care about any of that. I rather have my normo friends use something "bloat-less" from the very beginning instead of messing around with scripts and the registry tool, otherwise might as well use fucking Arch. Not to mention you would still be using Windows, just slightly better. A polished turd is still a turd.
>Every distro is actually the same except they actually are not
Brilliant.
>Why not one distro
Because different people = different needs. I don't care about compiling everything on my computer, but Gentoo users do. I don't care about bledding-edge, but Arch users do. I care about a comfy desktop environment, but some people don't and prefer a tiling wm. You can't simply make a single Linux distro and force people to use it, that's like saying you want to create a single footwear size. Actually forget that, the "universal" distro already exists, it's Ubuntu, just go and use it, why would you care about what other people are using? Even if somehow every single developer on the Linux ecosystem joined forces to kill Winblows or whatever, it wouldn't last a second. Fedora devs would want to remove something important, Gnome ones would close your bug reports, the freetards would remove the coreutils because "achkshually they are not 300% free", and so on. Just stick to whatever OS you like and that's it, and contribute to it if you want to help.
