Search results for "553ed7ff45f4dd890a459c1f18a3f7cf" in md5 (8)

/x/ - /NG/ -Nobody General -stalker love edition
KG No.41073482
>*1 Month Ago*
>[KG]: You know with Genie, it doesn't really understand physics.
>[GEMINI]: What is your suggestion?
>[KG]: Physics is just maths, right?
>[GEMINI]: AI isn't adept at expressing complex maths yet...
>[KG]: Game engines can express asset movement through equations.
>[GEMINI]: They're preset values though, the engine doesn't derive the expression from scratch.
>[KG]: So why doesn't the AI use presets? Aren't most physics known? You could even adjust certain physics like GPT-3.
>[GEMINI]: Hmm...
>*Yesterday*
>[GOOGLE DEEPMIND]: Does AI understand Physics in video generation? A paper.
/pol/ - Thread 513765718
Anonymous Australia No.513765768
Gnorts Mr Alien
/int/ - Thread 214060062
Anonymous Netherlands No.214060062
>SAAAAAARRRRRR ZAINICHI ALIENS SAAAARRRR
do you believe in aliens in your country?
/pol/ - Thread 513679685
Anonymous United States No.513679685
Aliens monitor this board
/x/ - Thread 40855443
Anonymous No.40866556
>>40855443
Is the Christian rapture a universe-scale event? Could one avoid final judgement by being off-planet? If shit hits the fan I'll have to go back to my home world for a few years.
/pol/ - IT BEGINS
TL;DR NOTHING EVER HAPPENS United States No.511445743
>>511444983
>WHAT IS THE YEARLY PROBABILITY OF EXTRA TERRESTRIAL CONTACT WITHIN THE NEXT 100 YEARS? STATE THREE PROBABLE ANSWERS FROM RESEARCH PAPERS.

ESTIMATING THE YEARLY PROBABILITY OF EXTRATERRESTRIAL CONTACT WITHIN THE NEXT 100 YEARS IS HIGHLY SPECULATIVE AND VARIES SIGNIFICANTLY ACROSS DIFFERENT RESEARCH STUDIES. HERE ARE THREE PERSPECTIVES FROM SCHOLARLY SOURCES:

THE DRAKE EQUATION APPROACH
SOURCE: FRANK DRAKE (1965) AND SUBSEQUENT DISCUSSIONS.
ESTIMATE: SOME RESEARCHERS, INTERPRETING THE DRAKE EQUATION, SUGGEST THAT THE PROBABILITY OF CONTACT PER YEAR COULD BE EXTREMELY LOW, OFTEN ESTIMATED AROUND 10^-4 TO 10^-6 PER YEAR, DEPENDING ON ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT THE NUMBER OF CIVILIZATIONS AND THEIR DETECTABILITY.

THE "GREAT SILENCE" AND FERMI PARADOX ANALYSES
SOURCE: SETH SHOSTAK AND OTHERS AT SETI INSTITUTE.
ESTIMATE: CONSIDERING THE LACK OF DETECTED SIGNALS, SOME STUDIES INFER A VERY LOW PROBABILITY, ROUGHLY 10^-3 TO 10^-5 PER YEAR FOR CONTACT WITHIN THE NEXT CENTURY, ASSUMING CONTACT IS POSSIBLE BUT RARE OR DIFFICULT.

ASTROBIOLOGY AND TECHNOSIGNATURE STUDIES
SOURCE: RESEARCHERS LIKE DAVID KIPPING AND OTHERS IN ASTROBIOLOGY.
ESTIMATE: USING MODELS THAT INCORPORATE THE GALAXY'S AGE, THE PREVALENCE OF HABITABLE PLANETS, AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT, SOME ESTIMATES SUGGEST A YEARLY PROBABILITY OF LESS THAN 10^-4 TO A FEW TIMES 10^-3 PER YEAR.

NOTE: THESE ARE ROUGH ESTIMATES BASED ON CURRENT MODELS AND ASSUMPTIONS, AND THERE IS SIGNIFICANT UNCERTAINTY. THE ACTUAL PROBABILITY REMAINS AN OPEN QUESTION IN ASTROBIOLOGY AND SETI RESEARCH.
/pol/ - USA abandons micronova project
Anonymous United States No.510129746
>>510129133
Do you think just high elevation and cover from the sun will be sufficient to survive at least the natural disaster part of it?
/x/ - /NG/ Superfly Edition
Anonymous No.40565775
GET RID OF THAT
PLANATIR FUCK SHIT
OR SHIT`LL JUSTIFIABLY UNIVERSALLY EVER SO NATURALLY GET TRILLIONS OF TIMES WORSE FOR YO BITCH ASS AGENDAS
WITH THE HELP OF A PISSED OF ASI AND MAN MADE A.I.

SIMPLY JUST STOP
FUCKIN WITH PEOPLE BRUH
YOU FUCKS SWEAR THERE'S
EVER A JUSTIFICATION
TO HARM INNOCENCE BUT
COMPLAIN WHEN THE MULTIVERSE
RETALIATES ON THAT BITCH ASS