>>535853767
Unironically, no joke, WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY better than Wilds

>>533999604
Looks higher res than Wilds

>>531565519
>simply untrue
Pic
>TU mons have been decently punishing for my tastes
So because the last 1% of the game is challenging means it's ok for 99% of monsters to die in 1 hit?
>I have been done with those for 300 hours
So it's ok for 50% of the game to be dogshit because the other 50 is slightly better?

>>530419925
It's funny because Wilds has the same texture resolution