>>28581563
I'd get the 2013. Unironically the only year ever of KLR I'd avoid would be 2008, as they had oil burning issues.
BUT LOOK FOR A FIRST GENERATION ONE. They made them from 1987 to 2007 without changing a single thing other than the plastics. Parts for them cost pennies, and I know several people who have offered to trade me their gen 2/3 KLR for my gen 1 KLR. They're really really the best ones.
Any bike will be good though, btw. Even the oil burning on the 2008s is massively overstated, and is fixed with a $50 part from MCP I think.
>t. KLR appreciator.
Also someone bake a new bread

>>28483288
Posting again because last thred died. My gas tank is leaking and i don’t wanna just keep patching it. I found a mint leak free 87 tank but it’s white with blue accents. Would my humble klr look too much like a honda if I switched it out? Not that that’s a bad thing I just feel bad if my bike doesn’t look relatively stock

>a dozen comment hate chain started by my stupid pig adv bike
I’m so sorry /dbt/
Unrelated but my gas tank has a leak that I just keep patching. I found an absolutely mint first gen gas tank but it’s white, not red. Would it look too much like a honda if I threw a white tank on it?