>claiming Didio sabotaged it when the annual numbers were stagnant for four years
It was more agreeable than the New 52, but they were stuck in the same boat they were in before the New 52 when corporate told them they needed to raise sales or their jobs were on the line. The people in charge should have been fired in the late 00s.

They hired the EiC who mismanaged Marvel to such an extent that DC was beating them in market share during the years he was in charge, and they kept on the guy who hadn't been giving them any big results since 2005.

>>149378634
When you're consistently #1 you don't need to do special self-contained stories to catch peoples' interest.