>>150098630
Cherry picking is taking Brady's mediocre stats he put up in his 20s and era adjusting it to make him look better.

Brady had an all-time great 30s and 40s, there's no need for him to try to lie about Brady's lackluster 20s. Manning averaged 4k yards, Brady struggled to get 3.5k yards. He wasn't him until he got Moss. Peyton is him. Mahomes is him. Rodgers is him.

>>149844113
>No one outside of Philly has ever called Hurts the best QB in the game.
You didn't pay attention to what I said. I said IF Jalen had 3 rings there would be a fringe of people calling him the best, but people who actually watch ball know he's not as good as his peers such as Burrow, Allen, etc...
>The more apt comparison would be Burrow if he had won 2-3 rings and an extra pro bowl.
LOL you're out of your mind. If Burrow had 3 rings we would be calling him Mahomes. Burrow's stats are elite. Brady not so much at that age. Look at picrel, he was never top 5 in passing yards.

The data and eyetest just shows Mahomes is playing at a higher level than Brady

>>149791471
>>149791575
>Brady out of nowhere
I would never mention Brady vs Mahomes if guys like this would stop bringing up goat debates >>149788624, but you guys say nothing when he post since you have a dog in the race.

>>149690116
>>149688397
The spike you see is Brady getting prime Randy Moss, the same Moss who made a black backup QB lead the league in TDs (39) before he teamed up with Brady.

Why don't you compare Mahomes and Brady's first 7 seasons or even better compare what both did at similar ages. Mahomes mogs him in virtually everything at age 29 and it's not particularly close.