12 results for "67fa5e47cae329d8cbf1de99a8b60585"
>>61177077
kinda seems like their purpose is Cohen and the GME C-Suite is saying that they rrrrrrrrreeeeeeeaaaaaaaaallllllllllllllllllyyyyyyyyyy think that the price of gme will be above 32 within a year.

But do be mindful that the warrants date can be extended by the company.
>>60958729
>>60958736

UhOHHHHHHHHH, after he sold he offered 400m for the company, and then pitchbook listed it as sold, see here:
>>60958193

UUUUUUHHHHHHH OOOOOOHHHHHHHH
Shills have literally no real arguments left, just spreading blatant and subtle misinformation.
kek Ryan Cohen and Carl Icahn are going to give them something theyll never forget
>>60839485
>>60841543

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElKtpa6cgCk&ab_channel=BeardGroup

48 minutes she says (48:40), the filo is still looking for recovery there which hasn't happened in retail in a long time, except for fraud cases.

https://www.reddit.com/r/RiteAid/comments/1dla2c5/exboard_member_holly_etlin_makes_claim_that_what/

I think people are slowly waking up to the fact that some of the most important modern institutions (FED, DTCC) are private and were purposefully setup to extract wealth from the working classes. Now remember that these institutions have good reason to exist but should they really be private and should they really be shrouded in secrecy to the point that (alan greenspan said) "no other agency of government can overrule actions that we take"?
UH OHHHHHHH

>>60785735
>>60785822
>>60785864

MMTLP had trades hit the tape at ~$24,000, and finra is shidding and fardding. How come some of the most important modern institutions (the FED, DTC) and other auxiliary regulatory agencies like FINRA are PRIVATE? Thousands of years of devastation has led to some modern attempts at quasi-democracy, but the most important core foundational components of a "free and open" society are still private?

Alan Greenspan (chairman of the FED): "no other agency of government can overrule actions that we take". They could be running multiple sets of books for all we know, they've never been audited.
strange that there are thread participants here and in /GME/ who have been here for years, who clearly argue in bad faith and when confronted just fall back to:
>No one is short BBBY , it was canceled.

They will engage at first but then when you corner them with incontrovertible truths, they revert back to their script so they can get paid. Remarkable.

Fact:
Previous BBBYQ shareholders can still legally receive new equity + cash, per law, AND the judge has stated so explicitly himself.

>but but but where would the money come from>

from your bosses for refusing to sell to RC and purposefully bankrupting the company, AND from Ryan Cohen, Carl Icahn, Patrick Byrne, and others who would pay money just to watch the naked shorters scramble to cover what will require backstopping from the FED to do so. Usually when you beat them back with arguments like we are still in active chapter 11, then the 33% of the thread shills will come in with general demoralization and hype fatiguing strategies. Such easy tells.
>>716187902
Damn wonder what the next big legal update will be.
>rc sells shares of bbby in august 2022

>rc has a sitdown with a famous corporate raider, Carl Icahn in october 2022

>rc offers 400 million for BBBY in December 2022

>pitchbook (prestigious M&A software suite) lists BBBY as sold in January 2023

>one month later, February 2023 RC tweets “someone tell the government to stop shooting down my balloons”, alluding to bad actors delaying the BBBY restructuring

>only media appearance RC has made since entering gme in 2020 has been gmedd.com

>Larry cheng (who helped RC build Chewy, and is a current boardmember at GameStop, and a close personal friend to RC) went onto theppshow podcast (which is dedicated to BBBY discussion) 8 months after they filed for chapter 11, and 2 months after shares were placed in abeyance

>all sorts of scitzo speculation is allowed on here, reddit, and twitter, but when you mention any of the above, which comes from primary sources, posts are censored and people come out of the woodwork to go berserk about it

>platinumsparkles was allowed onto a video conference call with Gary Gensler, which implies she was considered passive enough to not ask hardball questions. She also spends literally all day engaging with bbby content on Twitter and spends hours rebutting all of it.

>mass media outlets all bash RC and his activities surrounding GME/BBBY nonstop for years, even in the face of RC's deafening silence.
These are some strange occurrences surrounding Ryan Cohen and his activities.

Also, the owner of the worlds largest Omni channel company tweeted about ryan Cohen's BBBY deposition.
https://x.com/typesfast/status/1835848394104877347

Also Patrick Byrnes old company; Overstock (which is the most famous example of a company battling naked shorts) purchased the BBBY IP, the same Patrick Byrne who has the attention of the 47th.
Very, very interesting.
https://x.com/xMarketNews/status/1854201924318298426
>>60532048
>As a matter of fact, the holders of HTZGQ got $1.46 plus 1/20 share of HTZ for every share of HTZGQ for the best BK result of the century.

Now explain to the class what happens to shorts when previous shareholders receive cash + new equity (ratio of new equity doesn’t matter) when there are 10x-50x more shares owned than were actually issued by the company.

By your own admission, previous shareholders received new equity, which by definition means shorts are on the hook for that, and the naked shorts are extra fucked if this is all documented and done on t-zero.

The company who purchases the shell, or the bigwig investors only need to distribute enough shares + cash to account for the shares officially issued by the company… when there are 50x more shares in circulation than we’re ever issued, naked short sellers are in deep shit.
>>508154099
>indiana - 73
topkek