>>213938599
financial crisis, incompetence and fatigue, in this order

>>213938734
I disagree. Back in the day there were already elite TV channels, as well as online sales and rent and DVD's and piracy


>>213939035
Disagree. Zillennials and zoomers are capable of binge watching good series and playing long video games. And while 'shorts' are recent concept, short videos have existed since inception of YouTube

>>213823433
DC had a good name before Snyder. TAS and animated movies, Arkham games, Nolan movies. Warner Bros studio also had a strong reputation at the time

In comparison, leading to Superman. DC has a bad name. Gotham Knights and Suicide Squad games, failed Snyderverse etc. Warner Bros has a bad reputation nowadays too.

>>213732156
nice

Nope.
People really have no clue how many people are after every single role.