Search results for "714730b9f8e9102260a34022e2e1bfef" in md5 (5)

/g/ - Steam deck still outperforms the Switch 2
GNU/Anonymous 8/26/2025, 6:00:37 AM No.106386311
GNU+Linux.png
GNU/Linux won.
/g/ - Brave will block Microsoft’s surveillance
Anonymous 7/28/2025, 10:38:35 PM No.106062363
GNU+Linux.png
>>106061453
GNU/Based
/g/ - Thread 105830859
Anonymous 7/8/2025, 8:56:43 PM No.105840601
GNU+Linux.png
>>105840258
Sneed
>But sitting there, quietly powering masses of the internet, without saying boo to a goose, is FreeBSD. And the companies using it? They’re not talking about it. Why? Because they don’t have to. The simple fact that dawned on me is FreeBSD’s gift to us all, yet Achilles heel to itself, is its license.
>Unlike the GPL, which requires you to share derivative works, the BSD license doesn’t. You can take FreeBSD code, build on it, and never give anything back. This makes it a great foundation for products — but it also means there’s little reason for companies to return their contributions.
https://freebsdfoundation.org/blog/the-report-of-my-death-was-an-exaggeration/
/g/ - Thread 105787571
Anonymous 7/6/2025, 7:53:52 PM No.105819337
GNU+Linux.png
>>105819164
Free as in freedom, not free as in beer.
>Many people believe that the spirit of the GNU Project is that you should not charge money for distributing copies of software, or that you should charge as little as possible—just enough to cover the cost. This is a misunderstanding.
>Actually, we encourage people who redistribute free software to charge as much as they wish or can. If a license does not permit users to make copies and sell them, it is a nonfree license. If this seems surprising to you, please read on.
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.html
/g/ - Thread 105637147
Anonymous 6/19/2025, 5:13:41 AM No.105637231
GNU+Linux.png
Free as in freedom, not free as in beer.
>Many people believe that the spirit of the GNU Project is that you should not charge money for distributing copies of software, or that you should charge as little as possible—just enough to cover the cost. This is a misunderstanding.
>Actually, we encourage people who redistribute free software to charge as much as they wish or can. If a license does not permit users to make copies and sell them, it is a nonfree license. If this seems surprising to you, please read on.
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.html