>>515044131
>When did single adult men become the big target for toy companies?
Because single adult men have the most money to spend.

>>514039036
The study does not exist, he literally made it all up.
Have some real study that shows vaccination did not worsen the disease, but actually reduced long covid symptoms: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38328496/
>Overall, by 90 days postinfection, 13% of cases had long COVID, with 27% of unvaccinated cases and 8% of vaccinated cases reporting long COVID (relative risk [RR], 0.31 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .22-.42]). Vaccination was also associated with significantly lower average severity scores at all timepoints (eg, relative severity at 90 days postinfection: -2.70 [95% CI, -1.68 to -3.73]).

>>513391814
It's just vulgar, how is this so hard to understand? Urinating is also "natural", that doesn't mean I want to see women gushing all over the sidewalk in public.

>>513192222
The video is staged

>>511964892
Friendly reminder that the "male loneliness crisis" is purely an American phenomenon and it's probably due to the fact that 71.6% of all adults aged 20 and over are overweight, including obesity. The number is almost evenly distributed among the genders with slightly less women being overweight & obese. This leaves only a small number of just 28.4% of women aged 20 and over who are even dateable and that's also not adjusted for age, meaning this number includes old hags and grannies.
But let's look at this in more detail: if you want a white girl that is between 18-27 years old, one that is not married, has no children, is between 5'0" and 5'10", and who's not obese or overweight - that leaves you with only about 2,370,000 women in the US, that's just 0.7% of the total population. So unless you have a deranged hamplanet or granny or milf fetish (which the vast majority of men has not), chances that you find a fertile girl in the US at a healthy weight who's also single, are very, very small.
Furthermore, Gen Z men are the first generation to realize true female nature in relevant numbers, since they grew up with Smartphones. Boomers and Gen X both held this naive view that women were more innocent and "empathic" than men. Since Gen Z is born in the height of "female empowerment" so many men have seen how sociopathic and narcissistic women actually are. They've realized that women aren't kind, fair or loving. They're celebrators of sadistic psychological violence and thuggery, narcissistic whores and vindictive cunts. It's a good thing that more and more men are checking out and we need to promote this lifestyle for men.

He makes a good point. Men who cohabitate with a woman won't do shit, they are useless in a revolution and they're most of the time even unable to construct any provocative thought. They are NPCs, as the pacifying nature of a woman domesticates and ultimately breaks the man, it makes him conform to the female world. This is why true radicals, true savants are almost always lonely.

>>509645553
"Designer babies" are Star Trek fantasy bullshit.
We don't have the scientific understanding and capacity to pick and choose for cosmetic traits and will likely never have the ability to accurately do so. What we can do is gender selection (in countries that allow this) and we desperately should do it, in order to cull 70% of all male fetuses imo. I'm pretty confident that we will not see a day when parents routinely use reproductive technologies to select for cosmetic traits, or even against multifactorial diseases (you need to do testing at private companies, which is expensive, and not all countries even allow this kind of tests). The complexity of the genome is too big, and the gene-gene, gene-environment, epigenetic interactions are too numerous and minute to control.