>>514058731
>The right position is to bring men and women back together for the greater cause.

kek

>GUYS WOMEN ARE OUR GREATEST ALLIES OK? I MEAN WE TREATED THEM LIKE PROPERTY FOR 4000 YEARS BUT THERE WAS NO NEED FOR THAT, IF WE HAD GIVEN WOMEN FREEDOM 4000 YEARS AGO SOCIETY WOULD HAD BEEN JUST THE SAME OK?

you people are so deluded

>>213983786

>give women freedom
>every country right after doing that, saw birthrates jump off a cliff

Simps will do anything but look straight at the soul of women. Our entire society now runs on simps: men subservient to women, who will do anything to keep a society functioning for the right of a woman to be a tinder whore for life.

>>513379028

Are you stupid?

Women were property for 4000 years of civilization and monogamy was enforced: every male got a woman

This is what led to civilization, the most powerful force on earth taht conquers all those stuck in tribalism mode, and has created all the wealth and science we currently enjoy

Women have NEVER selected their partners, except in the past 100 years of history. Before that it was the father of a woman who selected her partner for her, you dumb fucking normalfag

Woman freedom is a great concept in theory, in practice women are crashing civilization and creating an army of men who could revoke their freedom at anytime because they have been left alone to rot (60%+ of all males in all countries are alone now)

>>513001910

Our ancestors only bred because women were property of their fathers, forced onto monogamy by them, for 4000 years.

If we had given women freedom 1000,2000,3000,4000 years ago the results would have been the same: 99.99% of men would not be able to reproduce and would die alone without descendants .

Stefan can realize this or stop being a coping faggot with "just self improve and talk to women bro", we are way past that cope already.

I'm sick of this garbage narrative that men just gotta step up to get girls, when that was never done ever in human history. Women were property, that is why men had wives and a family. It´s the ONLY way 99% of men can get that

>>512605918

India:
ugly people
dirty
nepotism
loud
no concept of personal space
low IQ
multiplies like a virus

Japan:
beautiful people
clean
merit-based
quiet
respectful of others
high IQ
dying

It's over for Japan.

>>512580877
that statistic from OP is 100% wrong

Men only didn't reproduce in the past when they died young ( disease and war ). Otherwise everyone got married

The reason being simple: women were property, and the father of each woman wanted his daughter to marry a nice guy. THere were never incels until women were given freedom 100 years ago

Now all the women are fucking, while most guys are not

>>512534284
what could have been...

We gave women freedom 100 years ago. Now the pressure to marry is 100% gone, women don't care about monogamy anymore. This is the sole reason men are alone, when men were never alone for 4000 years of civilization when women were property and forced to marry

Enjoy your redpill, this is the truth of the subject.

I'm GENUINELY EXHAUSTED of people trying to find reasons to explain this phenomenon like "it's tinder, it's the internet, it's social media". No, it's simply one reason: women freedom.

All your ancestors only reproduced because monogamy was enforced for 4000 years of civilization.

>>512155225
Honestly the apps are a symptom, not a cause.

Is /pol/ reeeeeeeeeeally redpilled? Or just pretend-redpilled?

Let´s test shall we?

Answer me /pol/... what do you think about males having, 100 years ago, invited with no strings attached the women to have full voting power into their male-built society, and at the same time giving woman freedom to marry or not who they wanted?

4000 years of women as property. The breeding of a woman was decided by her dad.
>100 years of women freedom. The breeding of women is now decided by the woman herself

The biggest change in human history in the 5000 year old history of our world. And people today, even on /pol/, are like "it was always the same lol".

What are the biggest changes that we see, from changing from a Patriarchal, male-oriented breeder program, to a Matriarchal female-oriented breeder program, in these 100 years that the matriarchal breeder program has been in effect? The so called "equality"?

I have one of such changes, pic related. Before, every single working men bred, now 90% of working men do not breed (criminals are breeding fine though, women are extremely attracted to violent men).

>4000 years of women as property. The breeding of a woman was decided by her dad.
>100 years of women freedom. The breeding of women is now decided by the woman herself

The biggest change in human history in the 5000 year old history of our world. And people today, even on /pol/, are like "it was always the same lol".

What are the biggest changes that we see, from changing from a Patriarchal, male-oriented breeder program, to a Matriarchal female-oriented breeder program, in these 100 years that the matriarchal breeder program has been in effect?

I have one of such changes, pic related. Before, every single working men bred, now 90% of working men do not breed (criminals are breeding fine though, women are extremely attracted to violent men).