15 results for "7a3e55d69ecac6a8776ef1bafae7dc04"
>>719143927
They do everything together all at once. Like the recent game censorship which quickly turned into online age checks and chat control in case anyone wants to criticise Israel or their agendas.
>>719121959
You make it sound like it's a unique new thing.

Card companies were targeting porn in Japan last year and earlier before Project 2025 was a thought.

There are Forbes articles about Visa cracking down on porn from as early as 2003. Card companies support Pride marches and porn out of California. . . the real aim is to stifle speech under he guise of 'online safety'. All game chats monitored etc. We've seen this in the UK.
>>718892712
Last 10 years Conservatards weren't spearheading censorship in video games or entertainment.

Credit Card companies: Support Pride marches and Californian adult content. They were attacking adult content in Japan last year and earlier with no pretense of it being a religious conviction and before Project 2025 was a thought. UK/EU/Aus/Canada online safety bills - leftwing. Only thing right wing is Project 2025.

Credit cards were targeting porn long before. There are Forbes articles about Visa cracking down on porn from as early as 2003.
>>718358540
UK btw
>UK passes their shit to "protect the kids"
>LITERALLY the NEXT DAY after they censored posts about protests and any talks about migrants
It's amazing how actually retarded people are, you should vehemently oppose this every step of the way.
>>718161853
>btw conservatives are not on the side of gamers or white people who post here. The type of white people they are protecting have actual money. They WILL ban the games you like if they have the power to do so.
UK/EU/Australia/Canada aren't right wing conservatives and all are planning their own Online Safety Acts.

As for 'conservatives' you're talking about religious fundies and politicians, the average conservative is not wanting to ban the milquetoast male gaze in games.

Which can't be said about the average leftist who supported all the censorship on their perceived opponents, not just supporing Anita Sarkeesian and crusade on Gamergate 1 but everything Covid, Twitter era censorship of speech, debanking of political opponents. The establishment aming journos ran hit pieces on Stellar Blade and Dragons Crown because they had boobs.
We've seen what makes you cheer.
>>717661873
Your left wing that you defend.
>>717653364
Much worse than a mere porn ban.
All these measures to "protect kids and online safety they are planning to implement are to curb speech they don't like and quell dissent.
>>717280319
>Seeing left wingers and right wingers now blaming each other over video games, internet and porn banning and censorship is so delicious.

they jew shills just trying to create a blame game and hope energy is spent on in-fighting instead on who's controlling both left and right wing governments.

It works because right-wingers have no choice but defend themselves from their pilpul claims that they're the ones who are/were censoring games all along (even tho ESG and attacking the male gaze was coming from the left-wing), the left are the good guys etc. Censorship is exclusively a right-wing tenet and other such bullshit.

A British government official even admitted on tv this is designed to watch British adults for anti-migrant sentiments and other 'dissent'. They want a world where people can't criticise Israel without being put on a watch list. Can't criticise immigration etc. Very left-wing sentiments.

Governments across the world implementing ID requirements are all left-wing except America they'll still double down on the rhetotic that it's the average right-winger wanting this, it's just classic old chutzpah hhh.
>>717139793
You need to think deeper

Create problem - spread porn

Reaction - think of the children

Solution - governments (nearly all left-wing) enact speech laws and implement censorship and ID requirements so they can quell dissent. And you can't criticise Israel etc.
>>512089571
You need to think deeper

Create problem - spread porn

Reaction - think of the children

Solution - governments (nearly all left-wing) enact speech laws and implement censorship and ID requirements so they can quell dissent. And you can't criticise Israel etc.
>>511428680
Based Morgoth called it out as well. They're censoring coverage of the protests going on.
ffs
British government censors anti migrant protests. It's "pornographic"
The Keir Starmer government has decreed that videos or other communications concerning protests opposed to mass migration is now considered to be pornography. Under the Online Safety Act 2023, platforms will now have to require ID checks in order for citizens to be allowed to view these posts, or else it is considered distribution of obscene materials to children.
>>511405885
If that were it, but it's already being used to silence dissent and censor protests. They censored the Leeds Migrant hotel protest from last night.
So you can bluster and stumble to come up with some reason to censor freedom of expression, of assembly, of protest but we all know a society who has descended to censored peaceful protests is a tyrannical society.
You're either a Brownoid or a 77th brigade unit member, whatever you are you're a useful idiot to your own demise.