>>510779595
isn't this kinda the key? I havent followed this conflict much outside of the whole Wagner moscow march and the recent Trump funnies and I also know nothing about military hardware. but it seems self deprecating for Ivans to circle-jerk over such a small number over 2 years.
What happens if Trump doesnt save Russia and throws a few hundred abrams at Ukraine? The US has shit tons of newer models like
>>510779635 said
Ukraine Tank Losses (visually confirmed):
~1,200 total. Soviet tanks: 366 T‑64, ~358 T‑72s, 75 T‑80s, 5 T‑84s, 11 PT‑91s. Western tanks: 14 Leopard 1A5, 40 Leopard 2s, 9 Strv 122, 4 Challenger 2, 22 M1 Abrams, 6 AMX-10 RC.
Russia Tank Losses (visually confirmed):
~4,070 total. Includes 1,193 T‑80s, 248 T‑62s, 187 T‑90s, plus hundreds of older T‑72 variants. Losses include destroyed, damaged, abandoned, and captured—actual totals likely much higher.