>>96456991
You just don't get it man. Land destruction was fine 30 years ago in 1vs1 play. That means there can't ever be anything wrong with it. So if I play some mana rocks and blow up all lands, it simply means that I'm smarter than everybody else. You should be thankful to be allowed to watch me play the game while you can't do anything without lands.

>>716365983
I should add that some games are so easy to 100% and so good, like Hit and Run or Bully, that I'll 100% them each time I replay them because why not.

>>60632131
>Anon doesn't know how to count
Insanely impossibly bullish. Not knowing how to count means that any value between 0 and infinity is possible, and there are far more numbers that exist beyond the price of even the most expensive stock in existence. SMCI to ten quintillion.