>>718171992
>>because the composer didn't like the idea of his music being put through a content ID system
it was more than that. he was asked to supply new tracks on demand, which he couldn't do. moreover, they asked him to sign a form saying that he had the rights to the tracks, which he couldn't guarantee owing to the dubious copyright status of the music samples he used

>>718169171
ACC did nothing wrong

>>715382471
He said he can't claim legal ownership because he used other people's stuff and they just told him "it'll be okay just trust us we'll handle it" even though the contract would have made him responsible.