pilates, representative of rome which ruled the area and made its laws declared him innocent and wanted him to go free
>24When Pilate saw that he was accomplishing nothing, but that instead a riot was breaking out, he took water and washed his hands before the crowd. “I am innocent of this man’s blood, he said. “You bear the responsibility.”
>25 All the people answered, “His blood be on us and on our children!
>13Then Pilate called together the chief priests, the rulers, and the people, 14and said to them, “You brought me this man as one who was inciting the people to rebellion. I have examined Him here in your presence and found Him not guilty of your charges against Him. 15 Neither has Herod, for he sent Him back to us. As you can see, He has done nothing deserving of death. 16Therefore I will punish Him and release Him.”

>18But they all cried out in unison: “Away with this man! Release Barabbas to us! 19(Barabbas had been imprisoned for an insurrection in the city, and for murder.)
>20 Wanting to release Jesus, Pilate addressed them again, 21but they kept shouting, “Crucify Him! Crucify Him!
>22 A third time he said to them, “What evil has this man done? I have found in Him no offense worthy of death. So after I punish Him, I will release Him.
>23But they were insistent, demanding with loud voices for Jesus to be crucified. And their clamor prevailed. 24So Pilate sentenced that their demand be met. 25As they had requested, he released the one imprisoned for insurrection and murder, and handed Jesus over to their will.
Kikes killed Jesus, the representive of rome declared him innocent but sacrificed him because the kikes were staging a riot over it and claimed he would rebell against rome by supporting a non roman approved king. and to not be blamed for the rebellion or tried for betrayel he gave Jesus over but removing the blame from the kikes who instigated is more than just wrong but clearly dishonest

>muh King of the Jews
It should be noted that Christ never called Himself such, and only others called him so.
I would also argue this is a heavy mistranslation. The original read
>>INRI
>Iesus Nazarenus, Rex Iudaeorum
>Jesus the Nazarene, King of the Judeans
Iudaeorum or the greek Ioudaios, that now get translated as "Jews" refers to the citizens of Judah >>507487918. Judah at this point was heavily multi racial after the babylonian conquest and captivity, the integration of the edomite (which are the root for those we call jews today) to the point that Herod the king at the time was an edomite, as well as the roman conquest of Judeah all caused that the actual Israelite descendents are but a fraction of the citizens. We have an assyrian tablet talking about how all of samaria was replaced with a foreign people. Yet fates, much like governance usually are tied to the location, the land and cities.
Christ came to Judeah, and was the rightful king of its people, of which "jews" are but a fraction.

In fact the the sign "INRI" states His crime, being to be the king over Judeah. Which is why the jews even demanded the sign to be changed as this sign legitimizes Christs authroity mocking the actual jews
>19Pilate also had a notice posted on the cross. It read:
>JESUS OF NAZARETH,
>THE KING OF THE JEWS.
>20Many of the Jews read this sign, because the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city, and it was written in Hebrew, Latin, and Greek. 21So the chief priests of the Jews said to Pilate, “Do not write, ‘The King of the Jews,’ but only that He said, ‘I am the King of the Jews.’”
>22Pilate answered, “What I have written, I have written.”

>>508452602
They mocked him on the cross. But that was more to ridicule the jews which are generally a hand full, them, the romans, not being involved with local cult affairs.
Thats also why they announce
>3And they went up to Him again and again, saying, “Hail, King of the Jews!” and slapping Him in the face.
And before that whipped Him.
They pierced Him with a spear to check if He is already dead (He was)

But dont let this all distract you from the fact that rome (pilate) declared H innocent amd that jews did their all to have Him killed.

>>507814506
I don’t care what you think lmao

>muh King of the Jews
It should be noted that Christ never called Himself such, and only others called him so.
I would also argue this is a heavy mistranslation. The original read
>>INRI
>Iesus Nazarenus, Rex Iudaeorum
>Jesus the Nazarene, King of the Judeans
Iudaeorum or the greek Ioudaios, that now get translated as "Jews" refers to the citizens of Judah >>22828704. Judah at this point was heavily multi racial after the babylonian conquest and captivity, the integration of the edomite (which are the root for those we call jews today) to the point that Herod the king at the time was an edomite, as well as the roman conquest of Judeah all caused that the actual Israelite descendents are but a fraction of the citizens. We have an assyrian tablet talking about how all of samaria was replaced with a foreign people. Yet fates, much like governance usually are tied to the location, the land and cities.
Christ came to Judeah, and was the rightful king of its people, of which "jews" are but a fraction.

In fact the the sign "INRI" states His crime, being to be the king over Judeah. Which is why the jews even demanded the sign to be changed as this sign legitimizes Christs authroity mocking the actual jews
>19Pilate also had a notice posted on the cross. It read:
>JESUS OF NAZARETH,
>THE KING OF THE JEWS.
>20Many of the Jews read this sign, because the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city, and it was written in Hebrew, Latin, and Greek. 21So the chief priests of the Jews said to Pilate, “Do not write, ‘The King of the Jews,’ but only that He said, ‘I am the King of the Jews.’”
>22Pilate answered, “What I have written, I have written.”