>>536279275
now you're just making stuff up.
i never use such boastful and relative terminology in self-reference. i err on the side of objectivity and would never use "manly":
>>530048138
first of all: >press X to doubt
second of all:
if you post here, i am certain you eat carpet.
you play carpetmuncher games for faggots and faggot-apologists because i don't see you brave enough to play the no-no route.
