4chan Search
6 results for "a1c9d47e46f68f794e612183d8f6c1b7"
I haven't played Roblox in a decade but I'm here for tamers kino
>>720067145
That's the first one, bitch.
That's the first one, bitch.
>>42373414
Because Tamers has had over a decade of writing Bartleby. And Rarity in the canon show has certain traits similar to Bartleby just not as extreme.
And Tamers Rarity is basically Bartleby but less sociopathic, kinder, and is poor.
Of course Tamers can only write gold with Rarity.
Because Tamers has had over a decade of writing Bartleby. And Rarity in the canon show has certain traits similar to Bartleby just not as extreme.
And Tamers Rarity is basically Bartleby but less sociopathic, kinder, and is poor.
Of course Tamers can only write gold with Rarity.
>>714698097
>But Superstars doesn't have fucking anything.
It has damn near perfect physics, solid level design and like half of the OST's great. If you actually believe Superstars is worse than the games you listed and aren't desperately baiting to get a Sonic thread going then you're literally, genuinely and factually retarded. There's no two ways about it. Superstars hate is the most forced meme the Sonic franchise has ever seen.
>But Superstars doesn't have fucking anything.
It has damn near perfect physics, solid level design and like half of the OST's great. If you actually believe Superstars is worse than the games you listed and aren't desperately baiting to get a Sonic thread going then you're literally, genuinely and factually retarded. There's no two ways about it. Superstars hate is the most forced meme the Sonic franchise has ever seen.
>>42291835
>>42292170
>>42292185
I'm not involved in this debate but OP you have to admit that the second you decided to make a Tamers thread the quality of discussion nose-dived compared to the last couple threads.
For me I was only mildly annoyed that you didn't even bother to link the previous thread or post Tamers youtube or the archive. The only thing that genuinely annoys me is your OP question. It doomed the thread to tranny talk whether you intended it or not own up to it.
>>42292170
>>42292185
I'm not involved in this debate but OP you have to admit that the second you decided to make a Tamers thread the quality of discussion nose-dived compared to the last couple threads.
For me I was only mildly annoyed that you didn't even bother to link the previous thread or post Tamers youtube or the archive. The only thing that genuinely annoys me is your OP question. It doomed the thread to tranny talk whether you intended it or not own up to it.