>>17809241
As it says, all scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable. There are no actual contradictions. Often by combination of two passages we will actually learn something new about an event.
For example the Old Testament never specifies the exact length of King Saul's reign. But in Acts 13:21, Paul mentions by divine inspiration that it was forty years long.
Here's another example. In Numbers 25:9, the Bible states that 24 thousand people died in a plague. Later in 1 Corinthians 10:8, Paul refers back to this, and says that 23 thousand people died in a single day. Even though that seems at first to be a contradiction, it's really not. It's possible that 23k people died on the first day of the plague, and another 1k died after that. Both Biblical passages are still true. Paul merely tells us more information about this incident: 23k out of 24k died in a single day, while the rest died on a different day.
There is absolutely no contradiction with that. I know of many more examples like that.
I already knew about the Ahaziah example before you even made this thread. I've already given the answer many times before. I know about the Quirinius example.
Another example: 2 Samuel 8:4 and 1 Chronicles 18:4. These two passages don't contradict either because horsemen also count as footmen. There could have been 7000 horsemen at the beginning of the battle and only 700 remaining at the end, with the remainder being dismounted during the fight. Therefore both passages are true.
What about 2 Samuel 24:13 and 1 Chronicles 21:11? Those don't contradict either because in 2 Samuel it is Gad speaking, while in 1 Chronicles it's the exact words that the Lord used. There were already four years of famine by that point so Gad adds those onto the three.
Ezra 2 vs Nehemiah 7? According to Nehemiah 7:5 he is reading the tallies from an inaccurate scroll, while Ezra 2 reports the real numbers.
And so on. There is always an answer in each supposed contradiction.