>>3828001
I disagree wholeheartedly because there are multiple views of justice, and coming to see just how he hurt his friends would make him wish he had given it some more thought.
>they did what they had to do in order to bring justice to the greatest amount of people who needed it the most
and getting to reflect on that more since he's a justice soul, he could also ponder on if injustice to the few is ok. isn't justice supposed to protect those that aren't part of the many? isn't it supposed to take into consider those that everything else left by the wayside? I'd say thats a strong yes but its understandable if you disagree.
> Clover themself seems to be fairly pragmatic about it when they do it in canon
they are also a child that thought about it for about 15 seconds that we witness on screen before making a decision. they genuinely take a quick moment to think on it.
>while Clover doesn't see what they did as wrong in the slightest, even though they understand how their friends were hurt by it
I think we're going to have to agree to disagree here. being that he's a justice soul, he may outwardly point to the greater justice, but knowing that he failed the few in order to save the many means that justice failed in some way that day.
Justice for all is an extremely valid way that a "justice soul" person could think, and I believe that the conversation with his friends would show him that he failed to give justice to them, but he also failed to give justice to himself. it would be the start of a life where he could learn that maybe sacrificing himself for others isn't what justice is supposed to be.
I comprehend where you are coming from but I simply can not reconcile the view of clover having no regrets when he learns of how those around him were hurt. I'm still fine continuing the conversation but I think at its core we have a different belief on what constitutes "good" justice.
