>>714332840
>Yeah, sure. Townspeople talk when asked and will sometimes tell you the truth of everything if you just stay long enough. And 99% of the towns popular for UFO activity are just like places where bigfoot has been sighted; tourist traps.
The town had like 50 people living in it, and what they said was corroborated by physical evidence.
>The hypothetical aliens you screech about cannot be feasibly taken down by a stray missile and will never work with the government for any reason.
A nuclear weapon is a pretty big step up from a stray missile, the temperatures and pressures they produce are only matched by stars and I don't think a UFO would survive hitting one of those do you? You assume they're infallible, why? You assume they care about crashing or leaving technology for us, why? You assume they cannot be harmed by us when we can be harmed by insects or microbes, why? Your argument is based on empty assumptions, the weight of evidence is against you.
>Doesn't it seem strange to you that all of this hoopla about government agents confessing to the existence of UFOs and alien contact only cropped up recently when society is at a tipping point
Not really, former government employees, soldiers, and other individuals of high repute have been revealing information about UFOs for decades, often ignored before due to government intervention, media ridicule, and low coverage. The documents that have been leaked anonymously paint the U.S. as a monstrous corporatized organization out of all control that murdered its own president and many of its own citizens, that isn't very good disinformation if you want to control people. There was last year's New Jersey "drone" flap which caused widespread concern along with the "drone" swarms above U.S. military bases bringing congressional hearings into the mix and even closer scrutiny.
