Why do they use the latin alphabet for everything?

>>281819492
>>281818887
It doesn't help that absolutely nobody took Megumi seriously because Gege failed at making his relationship with Tsumiki compelling at all or developing their relationship. Tsumiki just got booted into being some literal who random bitch who had a Sukuna cocksleeve gimmick who just died.
On paper people should be understanding of Megumi as some great tragedy (if Tsumiki wasn't written like shit) but nobody gives a fuck because the entire plotline was trash when that was 80% of his character at that point

Are the pakis finally slaughtering the bongs?

Someone explain to me how first world countries with best universities and besr eduation systems constantly lack skilled labour while somehow thirld world shitholes where everything is falling apart is supposed to be provide said highly skilled migrants.

>>513329382
Are you sure the Great Satan America will even last that long?

>>513267492
>This is not the 90s anymore, Poland is no longer corrupt

Can't tell if this nigga for real

>>513186793
This is either a woman or some retarded liberal boomer

If Darby's dropping from Mt. Everest, wouldn't he technically be coming out of the ground from below?

>>509245878
>"and subject to the jurisdiction thereof"
Why are they putting that Kilmar Garcia guy on trial if he's illegal and not subject to their jurisdiction?

>>81530589
>any ideas
Have you ever considered focusing on workouts with the same energy you put into making creepy 4chan rape threads?

>>712878314
>Cope zoomers
Yet
>This was most zoomers first mario kart

why would i care what white women do
the laws prevent course correction because they have rights
seething isnt solving anything
actually its a sign of impotency and weakness in the poster
nothing ever happens

>>507512654
>american talking
chat who dis nigga, chat?

>>507486151
I swear I fucked this chick before.

Would you agree or disagree that, across all human cultures, it is recognized that there are unenviable situations and crises wherein there are no winning decisions, and that any decision you make will feel ultimately "wrong"? And that, due to the unavoidability of these decisions, the moral offense is either lessened or even negated so long as the intentions are good?

Are there any cultures that openly reject this? Or is this a universal emotional moral principle?

If examples are required; one is euthanizing a companion animal who is going to inescapably suffer until they die, either during their suffering or immediately preceding it. Nobody wants to kill their companion, but nobody wants their companion to suffer, either. Therefore I can't particularly blame anyone for either choice, so long as it was taken with the best intentions, and can't think of a culture that would.
The only possible exception would be Buddhists, given death doesn't end the animal's suffering in their eyes, but that's due to their religious and spiritual beliefs affecting their how they actual interpret the situation/crisis, rather than them rejecting the notion of no-good-options negating moral guilt. I would imagine that if a Buddhist understood the rationality behind euthanizing a companion pet, even they would be hard pressed to consider the owner immoral in the same sense as someone killing because they wanted to, or even killing to survive.

>>279623916
What is this image trying to convey?
That those two women's souls are trapped in his right gauntlet?