>>150572154
I don't deny the Cheifs' success happened. I just think that
A) Mahomes gets waaaaaay too much credit because the team has always had either a loaded offense or a really good defense and he never had to to try and salvage a sub-.500 team or dumpster fire like most guys do
B) Most of that success only happened after Brady was no longer there to step on his throat. He never surpassed Brady, just kept losing until Brady wasn't there to dad dick him any more. The guy he beat for his first ring was Brady's backup. He had to take out the understudy because he couldn't beat the actual guy

>>150345892
>REFFIES! KELCE! SAVE ME!!

BTW you just know he's watching this thread and is absolutely seething

>>149926137
Shant

>>149868199
Brady's season high for touchdowns is the same as Mahomes

Brady's season high for yards is better than Mahomes

Brady has the record for most completions in a season.

Brady has the record for most passing yards in a super Bowl

Brady has the record for most passing touchdowns in a career

Brady has the record for most passing yards in a career

Brady has the record for most completions in a career

Brady has the record for most wins in a career

Brady has the record for most playoff wins in a career

And oh yeah, Brady has the record for most super bowl wins in a career.

Brady is not the rings guy. He's the "all the rings and all the stats guy." He's Bill Russel and Wilt Chamberlain at the same time. And part of the reason he has seven rings (more than any FRANCHISE, in case you forgot) is because he stole 2 from Mahomes. And Mahomes will never be able to live that down. because he ain't getting seven and if he has less rings and is 0-2 forever well that makes him Tom's eternal bitch, doesn't it?

It's already over. It was over before it even began. Cope, seethe and dilate but stop with the delusions already. The argument was settled after Brady dad dicked him in the super bowl

>>211923178
There are more Euros who know Tom Brady than Americans who know Robbie Williams, innit?