>>17966372
>When the monkey types out the Hamlet, it is fully random, even if it reads as a fine complex piece od literary art.
le monkey le typewriter is a bullshit argument because it assumes that the monkey and typewriter would always act as monkey and typewriter - which defies the definition of randomness
A world made in the nature of randomness would mean that NOTHING is predictable.
The monkey can be a splat of mud one second and a door on the next
And that's assuming that time even exists in a world of actual randomness